
While the “What-Would-Jesus-Do?” wristbands are no longer in vogue, the phrase itself has not passed off the scene. People continue to speak of it, and continue to use this question to guide their ethical decision-making process. While the question itself is a good one to ask (it’s good to want to do what Jesus would do), and can be valuable to making difficult ethical decisions, it is too subjective and will not be used properly by most people. I have three reasons for saying so.
First, it has been my experience that most people who use “WWJD?” as a guide for making moral decisions know little about Jesus’ ethical teachings and the kind of life He lived. Why? Because they are Biblically illiterate. It’s kind of difficult to know what Jesus would do if you don’t know the kinds of things Jesus did do, and are not familiar with the ethical principles Jesus taught. There is simply no standard by which to make an accurate and adequate evaluation of what Jesus might do.
Secondly, we tend to think Jesus would do what we think is the right thing to do. We project onto Jesus our own ethical system. We reason that if Jesus were as smart as people say He is, of course He would agree with me! But by doing so we argue in an ethical circle. While we claim we are being guided by what we think Jesus would do, what we think Jesus would do is determined by what we think is right. So we put into Jesus’ mouth our own words and call that our ethical authority. This is circular reasoning at its best.
Both of the above reasons are rooted in an unfamiliarity with Jesus’ moral teachings and way of living. My third reason for doubting the value of the WWJD? principle of ethical decision making, however, applies even to those who are Biblically literate. While I may think I know what Jesus would do based on my knowledge of His life and teachings, the fact of the matter is that I cannot know for certain what Jesus would do in most circumstances. Jesus taught and did some pretty crazy things in His day that surprised even His very morally-minded Jewish followers. What we think Jesus might do in our circumstances based on our knowledge of what He did do in His own circumstances may not be what He would actually do. For these reasons I remain skeptical that WWJD? is a good guide to moral decision-making.
May 9, 2006 at 3:46 pm
Would Jesus have his own blog? If so, would it be in a red font?
LikeLike
May 10, 2006 at 1:23 pm
Considering the fact that I think blogging is good, then surely Jesus must think it is good as well. So yes, He would be blogging. In fact, I’m sure He would call his blog Philosophical Ruminations. In fact, everything I write is exactly what Jesus would write. In fact, He wispers His thoughts into my ear and I just act as His transcriber.
And no, He doesn’t like red font. He prefers standard black. Ha!
Jason
LikeLike
May 11, 2006 at 8:31 am
John Nash had “someone” talking to him too. Hmmm…
I prefer green font because green has a calming effect.
LikeLike
May 11, 2006 at 8:42 am
How about HWJP?
How Would Jesus Pastor?
Sounds like good blog fodder to me.
Jesus would have definitely preferred green font.
Steve
P.S. Yes, I was repsonible for the John Nash comment too. Recently read the book A Beautiful Mind.
LikeLike
May 11, 2006 at 4:59 pm
Jesus “wispers His thoughts into [your] ear and [you]just act as His transcriber”?
It is actually much more direct for me – he uses my mouth as his mouth. My words are his…yes, even those ones….saith the Lord
LikeLike
May 14, 2006 at 12:11 am
WWJD? HDIK? (How would I know?) That’s what this blog:
http://gatheringgrace.blogs.com/thegathering/2006/05/wwjd.html
is saying.
LikeLike
May 15, 2006 at 11:40 am
HDIK? That’s good.
I was talking about this further with a co-worker on Friday and I gave an analogy that I should have put in the original post.
I imagine most people, if given a particular scenario, could accurately anticipate how their spouse would respond. Why? Because they know their spouse. They have a history together. They know their past thoughts and deeds, and that knowledge gives them a pretty good idea of how their spouse will choose and/or act in the future. Of course every married couple also knows that sometimes their spouse throws them for a loop!
I think this is similar to Jesus. The better we know Jesus the better we could discern what He might do. But then again, He is far more likely to throw us for a loop than our spouse. Besides, unlike our spouses, we don’t have access to Jesus’ mind and deeds on the same level as we do our spouse’s. I know about as much of Jesus’ mind as I knew of my wife’s on our first date. While we have quite a bit of information about Him in comparison to other ancient figures, it pales in comparison to the information we can get from someone we live with. My point, then, is that given what we know about Jesus’ thoughts and deeds, HDIK? what Jesus would do? We cannot possibly anticipate what He would do with the same amount of accuracy we could anticipate of someone like our spouse.
Jason
LikeLike
May 20, 2006 at 9:49 pm
So- do we have any frame of reference for the decisions we are making on behalf of God? Is it possible to super-impose our 21st century thinking/scenarios into the “reasoning” of Jesus Christ?
Even this afternoon my husband made a comment that he thought Jesus would take his disciples to “The Da Vinci Code,” sit, and eat popcorn while they laughed over it. Hmmm. The Catholics don’t think so…. but which of us is right?
We see “right” through the morality we’ve fashioned. Ask my parents “what Jesus would do” and we might be surprised to hear their answer. My Dad’s opinion varies from mine just out of sheer Old-School thinking.
Thank God that He speaks for himself! And I’m saving money on those bracelets…
LikeLike
May 24, 2006 at 10:29 am
That’s good Kara!
LikeLike