Believe it or not, Oneness churches are not the only Christians concerned about modesty! Reformed charismatic (yes, those two words can actually go together), C.J. Mahaney, has written a chapter titled “God, My Heart, and Clothes” for the soon-to-be released book Worldliness: Resisting the Seduction of a Fallen World. The chapter has been released in advance.
Mahaney’s approach is both Biblical and practical. I particularly liked how he emphasized the fact that modesty of attitude must accompany modesty of dress. Indeed, they are logically ordered that way. As he says, any discussion of modesty must begin with the heart rather than the hemline.
In describing what modesty is, he writes, “Modesty means propriety. It means avoiding clothes and adornment that are extravagant or sexually enticing. Modesty is humility expressed in dress. It’s a desire to serve others, particularly men, by not promoting or provoking sensuality.” Immodesty, on the other hand, “is much more than wearing a short skirt or low-cut top; it’s the act of drawing undue attention to yourself. It’s pride, on display by what you wear.”
But eventually we do come to the hemline. To women Mahaney asks, “What inspires your attire? Who are you identifying with through your appearance? Who are you trying to imitate or be like in your dress? Does your hairstyle, clothing, or any aspect of your appearance reveal an excessive fascination with sinful cultural values? Are you preoccupied with looking like the latest American Idol winner, or the actresses on magazine covers, or the immodest woman next door? Are your role models the godly women of Scripture of the worldly women of our culture?”
I am glad to see this issue is receiving attention outside holiness churches. It is a Biblical issue, and a Christian concern. And it is needed more than ever in today’s bare-all society. I know some churches have become quite legalistic over the matter, but that is no reason to dispense with modesty. It is reason to rescue true modesty from the shackles of legalism.
May 21, 2008 at 9:46 am
Legalism from both extremes. The matra of “God looks at the heart” has been just as abused as preaching people into hell over a split in the skirt. Both give the wrong impression of modesty. Both place undue emphasis on the wrong things. For example, “God looks at heart” is a true statement but what is on the inside will come out. In our speech, in our attitude, and in our dress. An undue focus on the exterior in some “holiness” churches is just another manifestation of pride. Allowing God to change us and manifest those changes to the world.
Reason to rescue modesty. I like that. Holiness is not a dirty word. Modesty is not a extrabiblical term. However in most churches today Holiness is “holier than thou” and modesty is Great Grandma clothes. How sad.
Thanks for giving the heads up on this book.
LikeLike
May 21, 2008 at 9:47 am
correction: “We should allow God to change us and manifest those changes to the world.”
LikeLike
May 24, 2008 at 12:29 pm
You can find a Catholic article on dresses, pants and modesty in church here:
http://www.newoxfordreview.org/article.jsp?print=1&did=0108-goguen
LikeLike
February 18, 2009 at 8:46 am
What about women and their hair today. Can holy women have short hair?
LikeLike
February 18, 2009 at 10:47 am
Aw,
I don’t see how hair is connected to the concept of modesty, but I’ll answer your question anyway. 🙂
It seems pretty clear to me that Paul’s teaching in 1 Corinthians 11 means men should wear their hair short, and women should wear their hair long. I don’t think this is a matter of holiness, however. According to Paul it was a matter of authority. Hair is symbolic of our submission to authority. Man’s short hair is symbolic of his submission to Christ; women’s long hair is symbolic of her submission to her man (husband/father).
Jason
LikeLike
September 3, 2009 at 11:06 am
Hi!
I understand modesty in wearing skirts that don’t reveal too much of a woman’s body. I’m curious how far one ought to take it though. What about running, for example? It seems to be more practical to wear pants or comfortable leggings when running. Is it egotistical of me to think that I might tempt a man while jogging? Is a woman running around in leggings and a baggy, sweaty t-shirt really all that appealing?
I’m really trying to understand the practical side of being modest. Perhaps there is no compromise in practicing holiness, practical or not, in the sense that holiness means refraining from being a stumbling block to a brother or sister (among other meanings).
Thanks for your help,
Shea
LikeLike
September 3, 2009 at 11:15 am
Shea,
I think we err if we identify one, and only one type of garment as being modest. Indeed, the tendency to equate “skirt/dress” with “modest” has caused many churches to overlook the fact that women are wearing immodest skirts (“…but it’s a skirt!”)! What matters most is modesty, whether one is wearing a shirt, skirt, or a potato sack.
Jason
LikeLike
February 16, 2010 at 12:26 pm
It’s me again, Shea, with another question. It hadn’t dawned on me until now that this post on modesty is under the category ‘holiness.’
Do you think that in the church the terms ‘holiness’ and ‘modesty’ are too often used interchangeably and if so do you think that this is all right?
Grace and peace be with you. Thank you for your ministry.
Shea
LikeLike
February 16, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Shea,
The two terms are not interchangeable, but I do think the issue of modesty is an issue of holiness. I think it is morally wrong to unduly expose one’s body. If it is a moral issue, then it is a holiness issue. I also think it is a mark of our separation to God to clothe ourselves appropriately. Since the idea of holiness is “separateness,” again, I think modesty is a holiness issue.
Jason
LikeLike
February 16, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Jason,
Just to clarify, I do believe your subtopic ‘modesty’ is appropriate under the topic ‘holiness.’
Indeed, the terms are not interchangeable. And yes, “modesty is a holiness issue.” Sometimes, however, I believe confusion arises when others specifically say ‘holiness’ when they are really talking about an issue of holiness, which is modesty. Perhaps this is just a distinction I should make to myself upon hearing one discussing in this particular manner.
Shea
LikeLike
July 13, 2010 at 12:53 pm
Just like Mahaney, i too believe that modesty first starts in the heart and then blossoms in your dress. I preached a sermon on this before. It makes no since (in my opinion) to dress in modest apparel if your heart is not filled with modesty first; its like dressing a hollow drum.
LikeLike