Last Friday Obama announced Joe Biden as his VP. That was somewhat of a shocker for me. But I guess the only thing better than one egomaniac on the ticket is two egomaniacs! (Clearly, I’m showing my political hand here!)
Today, McCain has announced his VP pick: Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska. I haven’t exactly been thrilled over John McCain, but his VP choice isn’t going to make it much easier for me to vote for him (but I will, as I am much much less thrilled over Obama).
Why am I not excited over Mrs. Palin? After all, from what I know of her so far, she seems pretty conservative, both morally and fiscally. What more could one ask for in a candidate? Experience! Substantive ideology needs to be matched with experience, particularly when they job they are “applying” for is the second highest position of power in this country (with a chance of taking the top spot if their boss kicks the bucket or behaves illegally). Not only is Mrs. Palin very young, but she has very little political experience. She has only been governor for a little over a year and a half. Sure, she was a two-term mayor as well, but she was mayor of a city with a population of less than 10,000. Running a small town, and running the most powerful country in the world aren’t exactly the same. I don’t have any reason to believe Mrs. Palin is prepared to be president of this country.
I’m also disappointed that McCain picked a woman. No, it’s not because I am a chauvinist. It’s because McCain seems to have picked a woman for strategic reasons, rather than because Mrs. Palin was the most qualified for the job. Surely, there were other Republicans more qualified. Why didn’t McCain pick one of them? Dare I say it’s because he’s hoping to women voters, particularly those who were Hillary supporters? It’s not a bad strategy when you think about it. A lot of women vote Democrat, and many were rooting for Hillary as the first woman president. Well, we all know that boat didn’t float. So McCain comes along and gives women another chance at getting one of their own into the White House. The hitch is that they have to vote for the other party. Brilliant!
In one sense I love it, because it gives McCain better odds at beating Obama, and I want nothing more than to see that happen. An Obama presidency would be a disaster in my opinion. But in another sense, I am not at all thrilled with the prospect of “President Palin” in the event John McCain dies in office. But who knows. Maybe my initial judgment of Mrs. Palin is wrong. Maybe she has wisdom beyond her years, and beyond her political experience that will make her a good vice president, and possibly a good president. We’ll see.
August 30, 2008 at 9:55 am
Jason,
She’s not the most experienced, but she does have more executive experience than Obama, Biden and McCain combined. At least she’s spent two years as a governor, while Obama hasn’t spent any time as a US Senator – he’s spent the entire four years running for president rather than doing the job for which he was elected.
Romney only served one term as governor. Pawlenty didn’t have much experience, either.
In a political sense, it’s good that she’s inexperienced. The Dems will focus on experience to be president, an issue that harms Obama. As with Quayle in 1988, if the Dems focus their fire on the veep pick while the GOP destroys the presidential pick, the GOP wins the election. People vote for presidents, not vice presidents.
LikeLike
August 31, 2008 at 10:57 pm
Arthur,
Good comments. She does have more executive experience than all the rest, which is both funny and scary at the same time. But she has the least political experience of them all. McCain and Biden have the most, then Obama, then her.
Yes, people do vote for presidents, not vice-presidents. If experience is what matters most to people, they will vote GOP. Obama tried to compensate for this by putting Biden on the ticket, but like you said, people don’t vote for vice-presidents.
It will be interesting to see how this election turns out.
Jason
LikeLike
September 4, 2008 at 8:14 am
Hello Jason,
Your points are well taken. I am cautiously expecting McCain to win this election. (In the last 40 years, we have had two Democrats elected to the white house. The U.S. prefers Republican presidents.) But I was surprised at his choice of Palin. It all makes political sense, of course, given his desire to show himself as “unconventional” as possible while simultaneously trying to reassure the solidly conservative base that he is reliably conservative. I could be wrong (of course, and I often am!). We shall see.
LikeLike
September 4, 2008 at 10:18 am
Right now I’m behind McCain pretty strong. I thought he did great a few weeks back at the Saddleback Civil Forum and after last night’s speech by Palin, I think he’s on track. If she’s as good as she seems to be this could be pretty incredible. Nobody recognizes great Americans as great, until, well, they are! So we’ll see. I’ve got more thoughts over at my place (booksmoore.com).
Chad
LikeLike
September 4, 2008 at 11:07 am
Brian and Chad,
I pretty much agree with both of you. I think Palin was picked more for strategic reasons than her qualifications, but I share many of her ideological viewpoints, and based on what we have seen so far, it does appear that she will make a good candidate, and hopefully a good Vice President.
Jason
LikeLike
September 5, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Is it true that Palin is a “polyester pentecostal” from the Assembly of God?
LikeLike
September 5, 2008 at 5:42 pm
I’m not sure what a polyester Pentecostal is, but I have heard the rumor that she is baptized in Jesus’ name. I won’t believe it until it can be verified.
Jason
LikeLike
September 5, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Arthur,
Here is a link of a video of Palin at church, in which the pastor testifies on her behalf about her baptism in Jesus’ name. Whether she has spoken in tongues, I do not know.
Jason
LikeLike
September 7, 2008 at 7:44 pm
All good points. I have to say that her lack of political experience is a good thing as far as I’m concerned. I think we have too many politicians in Washington. It is time for a normal person, who has shown she has the courage to stand for what she believes in, to go to D.C.
By the way, she supposedly has the H.G. as well.
LikeLike
September 8, 2008 at 3:45 pm
Darren,
The more I am reading of Palin’s accomplishments in her short political life, the more I am liking her. But I don’t buy into the idea that inexperience is the best qualification for the most difficult job in the world. Can you imagine any lesser job, such as president of a university or something, where we would say similar things?: “Come be our university’s president. Qualifications: that you have none relavent to the job.”
I don’t mean to say that one has to be of the establishment in order to be effective, but I am saying that inexperience is not an advantage, even if it can be conpensated for.
Jason
LikeLike
September 13, 2008 at 11:10 am
Jason,
Certainly valid points. I guess I am coming from a view point of that just because one does not have a resume experience in a specific area, does not mean they are not qualified. I believe that some people are simply leaders of character and intelligence who can be placed by God into position to accomplish His purpose and that He will enable them as needed. Perhaps God is interested in university president positions, I don’t know. I do know that He says in His Word that He is the one who puts world leaders into power to accomplish His purpose. In other words God qualifies them. This is obviously a theological way of looking at this and not a political or even common sense view.
Obviously if (please God NO) Obama becomes president then the same principle is true. It simply means God does not have a good future in store for America, at least in the short term.
Just ramblings of my thoughts. Not the most cognitive I admit.
LikeLike
September 14, 2008 at 7:19 pm
Darren,
I agree that one might be good for a position, even if they don’t have the relevant experience, but this is rather rare.
I also agree that God is sovereign, even over the realm of politics, but I’m not so certain that God places each and every leader into office. I think that if He wants a particular person in charge, He can get them there. Likewise, if He wants a person out of office, He can arrange for that. Similarly, if He wants to prevent a person from getting into office, He can do that. But I don’t think anything in Scripture commits us to the view that everyone in office is there because God wanted him/her (in particular) there. Obviously it is within His permissive will because it happened, but I don’t think it is always in His sovereign will. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe there is a verse of Scripture you can think of that contradicts my thoughts here. It’s been known to happen in the past!
Jason
LikeLike