Christian apologetics is an intellectual discipline that offers a rational justification for Christianity. One would think Christians would heartily embrace a discipline whose aim is to show the intellectual viability and superiority of the Christian worldview. Ironically, Christian apologists often face opposition from both unbelievers and believers alike.
Many Christians think apologetics is either unnecessary, or detrimental to faith. The latter understand faith to be commitment of the will in the absence of reason, rather than trust based on good reasons. Having reasons to believe, then, leaves no room for faith. This understanding of faith has no basis in Scripture. Indeed, God, Jesus, and the apostles all provided reasons for others to take their claims seriously. And they did so for good reason: beliefs are caused by reasons. If they weren’t, we would be unable to control what we believe. Beliefs would just pop in and out of our minds inexplicably. A Christian could be in church worshipping Jesus, when suddenly, for no reason at all he stops believing in Jesus and starts believing in Buddha. A man could be walking his dog when suddenly, for no reason at all, he begins to believe he is walking a cat. No, such is not possible because beliefs are caused by reasons. Beliefs are something that happen to us given sufficient epistemic conditions. We cannot just will to believe something. To demonstrate, stop believing in God right now. Don’t just think the thought, “I don’t believe in God,” but make yourself believe that God really doesn’t exist. You can’t do it, because genuine belief requires reasons, and you have good reasons to believe God exists, and no good reasons to think He doesn’t.
Those who think apologetics is unnecessary often claim the Spirit’s work is all we need for conversion. While it’s true that the Spirit’s work in our hearts is necessary for conversion, it is not sufficient. Indeed, if the work of the Spirit was sufficient in itself for conversion, then why do we need to present the Gospel to them? It’s because faith is contingent on knowledge. A person cannot believe in Jesus if they do not know about Jesus. God’s Spirit works together with our presentation of the Gospel to bring about conversion. Now here’s the rub. If faith requires knowledge, and apologetics delivers knowledge, why oppose the use of apologetics in evangelism? Apologetics serve to help remove intellectual barriers to the faith, so that one can submit to the working of the Spirit in their hearts. As such, it is vitally important to evangelism, and should be embraced by Christians.
Indeed, Peter himself thought so. He told us to “be prepared to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you” (1 Pet 3:15). Paul understood evangelism to consist of both the “defense and verification of the Gospel” (Phil 1:7), and instructed us to “make the most of every opportunity,” knowing how we “should answer everyone” (Col 4:5-6). Apologetics is not just a nice add-on to Christianity, but a Bible-based discipline integral to our evangelistic efforts.
May 27, 2009 at 7:41 am
It is, and Paul uses apologetics as the main way of evangelism.
The main problem I have, and if you can advise me that would be good, is that the more I study apologetics, the less “in touch” with God I feel.
As a young christian, I could “feel” God’s presence. However, now I have steadfast reasons to believe in God, I no longer “feel” the presence as often….
Whether it is similar to parent/child relationship and I’m supposedly all “grown-up” or else I’m focusing on study over prayer or both, I don’t know.
The end result is that I have faith in God and have sound reason to do so and can confidently state the reasons. Hopefully the “feel” will return, but in the meantime I will praise Him. 🙂
LikeLike
May 27, 2009 at 11:52 am
I can’t say that I totally agree with you. While I believe that apologetics are important, it is not what usually brings one to faith. Sharing personal experience and the convicting power of the Holy Spirit are what moves one to believe and receive.
LikeLike
May 27, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Scott,
I have experienced something similar in my life, and I can tell you that I have met hundreds of people who report the same thing, but not as a result of studying apologetics; rather as a result of studying theology.
I don’t know why it is, but for some reason, when people begin to focus on the life of the mind, they often neglect (or find it difficult to get in touch with) the life of their spirit. Of course, it’s not all detrimental. Studying theology and apologetics has made me (and many others) more solid in their faith and more productive for Christ.
I should also say that I’m not convinced that living a Christian life is about the feeling anyway. It’s about knowing the truth, and acting on that knowledge. I don’t need to feel the presence of God to know Christianity is true, and to know I need to do something about it. But of course, we all like the good feelings and spiritual experiences. If they are present, that is great, but that is not the essence of Christianity. I would rather have knowledge of the truth, and know how I know it is true, anyday.
Jason
LikeLike
May 27, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Lynn,
I agree with you, but I have never claimed that apologetics is what usually brings people to saving faith. In this post, I simply claimed that one cannot be saved without knowledge, and that since the purpose of apologetics is to defend the knowledge of the Gospel that we impart in our evangelism, that apologetics is a great tool of evangelism that Christians should support.
Jason
LikeLike
May 28, 2009 at 5:56 am
Yes, you are right then. I must agree that not many are interested in this fascinating subject. After coming to God I began to study apologetics (Lee Strobel, C.S. Lewis, etc.)and my faith soared! The Spirit of the Lord seemed to jump off the pages–My faith and confidence in God increased. Plus we are much better equipped to answer the questions of unbelievers.
LikeLike
May 28, 2009 at 3:01 pm
Lynne,
It’s great to see that you have witnessed the value of apologetics first-hand. You are absolutely right. Apologetics is a great confidence booster that our subjective faith has an objective, and rationally compelling basis in reality.
Jason
LikeLike
October 7, 2009 at 1:03 pm
i had the opposite experience… after studying apologetics from christian sites and the non christian arguments, and having my mind changed so many times by both sides… and then realizing that ‘faith’ can sometimes help (strenghten what you already believe) … but also hinder (e.g. converting a devout muslim despite presenting evidence)…
i’ve come to the conclusion that i’d put faith in God instead of my faith in my faith in God (if that makes any sense)…as i could be wrong like anyone else who might beleive sincerly the wrong thing…
my biggest problem i think with christianity is that i believe that God wouldn’t allow people to go to hell for rejecting Jesus as His son if they thought that doing so was pleasing to Him…
i.e. devout muslims or jews… they are taking what they believe as His word (koran, torah) in faith … just we take the bible…
LikeLike
October 7, 2009 at 2:56 pm
lamar9,
Yes, sometimes reason can seem to support different conclusions. When that happens, it becomes apparent that one side or the other is making a mistake in their reasoning that we cannot see, or there is more to the picture than we realize. The way to resolve the impasse is through more study, not by abandoning an examination of the evidence and just blindly go with one or the other option.
This is not to say that one cannot have genuine faith apart from rational reasons, but it is to say that the only way we can judge between competing religious claims is by examining them rationally.
Apologetics is not a matter of having faith in one’s faith. It’s a matter of solidifying one’s faith, or giving reasons for one to exercise faith. Faith is not blind. That is not the Biblical concept of faith. Faith is trust, and we trust people for reasons. Some of those reasons are rational, and some are experiential. But either way, we have reasons. Reasons are not antithetical to faith, but the foundation of faith.
As for hell, people don’t go to hell because they reject Jesus. They go to hell because they are sinners. Jesus, however, is willing to take their sin upon Himself if one is willing to trust in Him to do so. If they do not trust in Him, then they retain the guilt for their sin, and will pay the consequences. See my posts on this matter: https://theosophical.wordpress.com/2009/08/11/why-jesus-is-necessary/ and https://theosophical.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/why-do-people-go-to-hell-for-not-believing-on-jesus/
As for your final comments, this illustrates why we cannot just choose to believe this or that religion. It demonstrates why reasons matter. Blind faith is a dangerous faith because if you are choosing your faith by chance, then chances are you will choose the wrong one and the consequences could be spiritually deadly. We need to give our best thought to religious matters, not just take the lazy way out by adopting whatever fits our fancy.
Jason
LikeLike