This is a travesty of justice. A woman killed her neo-Nazi husband while he was sleeping, and will not serve any jail time for doing so. And it’s not because she was found to be mentally insane. It’s because her husband was seen to be such a bad guy. Indeed, he was. He was a white supremacist, a child pornographer, an abuser, and had the materials to make a bomb. Nevertheless, he was a human being. He needed to experience justice for his crimes, but being killed was not the appropriate form of justice, and his wife was not the appropriate person to determine his punishment. There is no question that she needed to remove herself and her daughter from this man’s influence, but divorce and/or relocation could have accomplished this. Killing him was not necessary. Given the woman’s circumstances I could understand if the court might have lessened her prison sentence, but to let her go scot-free is wrong. This sends a message to society that murder is justifiable so long as the person you are murdering is a bad person. How many other women might be emboldened to kill their abusive or crazy husbands as a result of this case? This is what happens when sentimentalism is elevated in a society. It can even trump the rule of law.
January 8, 2010
Apparently It Is OK to Kill Your Neo-Nazi Husband
Posted by Jason Dulle under Odds & Ends, Sin, Social[9] Comments
January 8, 2010 at 11:37 am
Just out of curiousity, Jason, do you support capital punishment?
LikeLike
January 8, 2010 at 3:31 pm
Yes, I do. See my article on it here: http://www.onenesspentecostal.com/capitalpunishment.htm
Jason
LikeLike
January 9, 2010 at 11:12 am
Greetings! Brother Dulle
I totally agree with you to a point brother Dulle that this woman got away with murder. Yet I am totally against capital punishment calling it state sanctioned murder citing that only the one true God of all creation has power over life and death. Therefore, this case only shows how far society has gotten away from the will, power, and character of the Lord God Almighty.
May the God of all grace continue to shew forth mercy, grace, and power to lead you unto the truth that you may become a well rounded man of the kingdom. in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.
Marquest Burton
LikeLike
January 9, 2010 at 11:48 am
This type of thing has happened before. Both the man and the woman was wrong. In one case the woman had first hand knowledge of this mans wickedness. In the other case the woman committed murder. The court system is not perfect but this woman’s judgment was most likely the correct one. Allowing her off without any kind of punishment is not justifiable, assuming we have all the facts concerning this case. What if she was under duress? What if he threatened her then went to bed?
LikeLike
January 10, 2010 at 9:07 am
I wonder how long its going to be before devout followers of Christ become this “Neo-Nazi”…Think about it.
Peace!
LikeLike
March 8, 2010 at 7:33 pm
Actually Neo-Nazis aren’t human beings. Nor are child pornographers. Her husband pretty much was begging his wife to kill him.
LikeLike
March 9, 2010 at 12:12 pm
Ro,
Says who? You? People can just arbitrarily decide the crimes for which a death penalty is appropriate, and can carry the execution out themselves? I’m no fan of neo-nazis or child pornographers, but that doesn’t mean they are not human; it doesn’t mean they are deserving of death; and it doesn’t mean that even if they are deserving of death, that I am the appropriate person to carry it out.
Jason
LikeLike
December 8, 2016 at 2:22 pm
if you know there is man eating tiger or lion out there, it is immediately hunted & put to death.
Just as the possible cure for pedophilia is castration & isoloation of the mentally derranged person from society.
So is with the NAZI, or Alt-right Member, they are mentally derraged & pose a serious threat to society, Hence must be HUNTED & put down on SIGHT.
IF you see a NAZI, ITS OKAY to KILL a nazi.
when in doubt, just make sure you only kill the confirmed NAZI before you call the police.
LikeLike
December 8, 2016 at 9:34 pm
If the King can decide who dies, at his leisure or deliberation, why then can the King’s subjects not decide what fits their deliberation?
LikeLike