To spank, or not to spank, that is the question—not “to beat, or not to beat,” which is not the question. Well, it’s not a question I am asking, but it is a question many parents debate—and all too often, those who aren’t parents. Many on the anti-spanking side disavow spanking on the grounds that “violence begets violence.” After all, how can you teach a child not to hit when you are hitting him/her? Doesn’t that send mixed messages? Dennis Prager has some wise words to respond to this objection:
“Violence breeds violence.” Some cliches are true; I find this one meaningless. The truth is the opposite: Immoral violence breeds violence; moral violence (such as just wars, police work and appropriate parental discipline) reduces violence.
I couldn’t agree more. This doesn’t mean one has to use corporal punishment on their children, but it does mean doing so will not breed immoral violence. Physical force often stops or prevents further immoral violence.
February 18, 2010 at 12:42 pm
Jason! Is that you giving the right hand of fellowship to that boy? 🙂
Prager’s comments are right on. I often ask liberals whether jails beget kidnapping.
LikeLike
February 18, 2010 at 2:00 pm
No, that’s not me. Ha!
I love the analogy! That is perfect, and I mean perfect. 🙂
Jason
LikeLike
February 19, 2010 at 9:36 am
Right hand of fellowship… hilarious!!!
Spare the rod… gives the nod.
LikeLike
February 25, 2010 at 10:46 am
Greetings! Brother Dulle
I contend that the manner of discipline must be left up to the parents whom through the wisdom, grace, and power of God will determine what method of discipline should be used towards their children.
May the God of all grace continue to shew forth patience, grace, and wisdom upon your soul to lead you to pure truth. in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.
Marquest Burton
LikeLike