A clinic in Spain is offering homosexuals treatment to “cure” their same-sex attraction. The Spanish government is now investigating the clinic. If they are found guilty of offering treatments to cure homosexuals, they could be fined. Why? Apparently because it goes against the country’s pro-homosexual agenda. As Spanish gay rights leader, Antonio Guirado commented, “You cannot treat something that is not an illness.”
So much can be said here.
First, I do not know the details of the treatment being offered, or the promises being made. The treatment could be a sham, and they may be promising too much. From what I know, treating same-sex attraction is not easy, and success is difficult to come by. So if promises are being made that anyone experiencing same-sex attraction can be “cured,” I think the clinic should be faulted for false advertising.
Secondly, notice the assumption that same-sex attraction is not an illness. I would grant that same-sex attraction is not a mental or biological “illness” in the normal sense of the word, but I think it should be obvious that something is amiss about same-sex attraction and homosex. If one’s sexual organs are designed to function with one gender, and yet their sexual desires are directed toward a different gender, and they are psychologically incapable of using their sex organs for their intended purpose, it is reasonable to conclude that something is awry. When one’s desires do not match the hardware afforded them by nature the problem is not with the hardware, but with the desires.
Thirdly, it was only 30 years ago that gays in Spain were shipped off to institutions. While I do not approve of such treatment, I find it interesting how fast a society can reverse itself. Spain has gone from persecuting gays to persecuting those who threaten the radical pro-gay agenda. It is a slippery slope. It begins with tolerance of homosexual behavior, then the legalization of homosex, then the general acceptance of gay persons, then the normalization of homosex, then the legalization of same-sex marriage (which Spain did in 2005). Once homosexuality has been normalized and legalized in a society, those who oppose it on either moral or legal grounds will be the object of persecution. And that’s exactly what is going on in Spain, and exactly what will happen here in the U.S.A. Indeed, it has already begun. The persecutors have become the persecuted.
Fourthly, what happened to freedom? Shouldn’t those who are experiencing same-sex attraction have the freedom to seek to change their sexual orientation if they desire to do so? After all, this clinic is not coercing people to go through the treatment process. Gay individuals are voluntarily signing up for the treatment because they want to change. Even if one believes that change is impossible because sexual orientation is immutably fixed (which the data does not support, btw), why not allow people the opportunity to at least try to change? It is the height of irony for a government, in the name of tolerance and freedom, to deny people the freedom to seek change. Why would they do so? I have a hunch. If one seeks to change their homosexual orientation, it sends the message to others that something is wrong with that particular orientation. Since the Spanish society has determined that there is nothing wrong with a homosexual orientation, they want to prevent those so oriented from seeking to change. I would be interested to see how the government would respond to a clinic that treated heterosexuals who wished to change their sexual orientation from heterosexual to homosexual. Hmm.
June 17, 2010 at 1:13 am
Hmm indeed.
I can’t really understand the problem with offering to try to change sexual preference (for preference it is) from one to the other even if I disagreed with it.
LikeLike
June 17, 2010 at 6:52 am
I’ve always wondered what would happen if science proved it was a genetic condition (as many argue) and women started to test for it pre-natally as they do for other genetic conditions, such as Down Syndrome. I’m thinking some heads would explode as they tried to justify a woman’s right to choose except in cases where the genetic test showed a positive result for ssa.
Still, this story proves that one should never underestimate people’s ability to accept their own choplogic.
LikeLike
June 21, 2010 at 4:14 pm
Tim C,
That was considered before. I can’t remember who or where, but about 5 years ago a pro-life legislator proposed a bill that prohibited a woman for seeking abortion due to the child’s sexual orientation. It was an ingenious political ploy. The pro-abortion crowd couldn’t oppose it without being labeled anti-gay, and the gay rights people surely wouldn’t oppose it either even if they were for abortion.
Jason
LikeLike
July 10, 2010 at 9:01 pm
I take this position:
I believe that the Word of God does not provide any suitable examples for homosexual actions, unions, or relationships; yet, at the same time I beieve that the homosexual phenomenon is an evolutionary adaptation to the changing environment of the world. Furthermore, just because an emotion is deep or powerful does not justify acting upon it. Like drugs, like adultery, like the abuse of alcohol, or the love of money, or the power rush of human ego trips, there are emotions which are powerful and addictive and ultimately terribly destructive. Same-sex unions, relationships, and homosexual actions must satisfy criteria other than emotion. I believe that homosexuality is not dependant on the traditions of natural biological characterizations and therefore immediately excludes itself from the natural vocation of sexual relations and even that of marriage.
(As someone who struggles with the evolutionary anomalies of homosexuality, I tend to seek the vocation of chastity and charity to improve the lives of others. I embrace this evolutionary disposition as a thorn in my flesh, just as Paul embraced the thorn in his flesh.)
LikeLike