Charles Darwin wrote, “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much who positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.”
While Chuck and I don’t see eye-to-eye on much, this quote resonated with me. I have experienced the truth of what he said both in my own life, and observed it in others’. Indeed, the truth Darwin captured here reaches farther than the sciences; it extends to virtually all areas of knowledge.
While not original to me, I have often said that the more I learn the more I realize I don’t know. Sometimes this means the solving of one problem leads to other problems I was previously unaware of—winning one battle only to start five more. Other times this means that in my attempt to solve a problem, the problem is exacerbated, because I come to realize that the question is much more difficult and the answer much less apparent than I had originally thought.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying the more one learns about any subject the more confused or agnostic they will become about that subject. Indeed, it will often be the case that study will bring one to a very firm conclusion. There are times, however, when I have firmly believed X, only to lose my confidence in the truth of X after having studied the issue in more depth. Sometimes this means changing my belief from X to Y, but other times it means no longer knowing whether to believe X, Y, or Z since all of them seem to be supported by good reasons. Until there is sufficient evidence to tip the scales in favor of one position versus another, one is left in a state of agnosticism concerning the issue.
Even if the scales are tipped in favor of one option over the others so that one comes to adopt Y rather than X or Z, they will often hold to Y only tentatively, or with reservations, always aware that there are good arguments against Y, and good reasons to adopt X and Z. For those who have never studied the issue out, such a disposition appears to be one of cowardice or compromise. That perspective, however, is a luxury only the ignorant can enjoy.
Experience tells me Darwin was right: ignorance often breeds high degrees of confidence—a confidence the informed can’t always enjoy. Sometimes facts and arguments have a way of complicating what is otherwise a very clear picture of reality. Other times facts and arguments have a way of making clear what otherwise isn’t. We should not be afraid to seek knowledge simply because it may decrease our confidence in X, for many times it will increase it.
For those who desire the truth, the path of knowledge is a necessary one, even if that means living with some uncertainties in life. Ignorance may be bliss, but it’s still ignorance. I would rather gain knowledge and be confused and uncertain about the truth than to risk being confident about a falsity. While uncertainty is never fun, sometimes it’s the only path from falsity to truth. For those who treasure truth above all else, the path of uncertainty is a necessary evil on the journey of knowledge. So before you throw stones at the person walking this path, you might do well to ask them if they know something you may not know. If you’re lucky, working together you will both reach the desires destination.
July 14, 2010 at 9:26 am
Too True my friend. The truth is, it takes more courage to honestly study a subject (open to the possibility that you may be wrong) rather than to continue to proclaim it’s accuracy without having fact checked the assertion. This has always been one of the major problems in the Church.
I mean by that statement, the blind belief in whatever is preached from the pulpit. I am not advocating rebellion or disrespect. Rather that our people would care enough to check what the Bible says for themselves. I often challenge my listeners to not take my word for it, but to study it for themselves.
This same statement can be made for Preachers as well. How often have we blindly believed and in turn taught what we have not studied for ourselves? I believe in respecting our Elders and Pastors, but I also believe in establishing my own view of Scripture by personal study.
I have personally lost count of the subjects in the Bible that I have studied with preconceived notions, only to find that the Bible didn’t say what I had been taught. This is where courage comes really into play. Will I continue to advocate that which I now believe to be unfounded? Or will I teach what I believe to be an accurate portrayal of what Scripture says? Even when I know it will not be popular.
While there are many truths in Scripture I can in good conscience be very dogmatic about, such as salvation, grace, etc., I have learned the hard way not to let my pride get in the way when someone proposes a different outlook on a subject. Nothing like adamantly declaring that person wrong only to actually study the subject with a more open mind and discover that you are the one wrong.
Sorry to ramble so my friend. I guess you touched the right button. 🙂
LikeLike
July 14, 2010 at 6:34 pm
Great perspective. Jason, you have a great gift. Glad to see you back!
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 7:39 am
Jason,
Here’s a good example of this topic. I preached on Mercy this past Sunday and in the message used Luke 6:37-38 to show that if we want mercy we need to give mercy. The context of this scripture is about mercy and how we deal with others, though it is often taught as a motive to give money.
Luke 6:37: “Do not judge, and you will not be judged; do not condemn, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven.
Luke 6:38: Give, and it will be given to you: A good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be poured into your lap. For the measure you use will be the measure you receive.” (NET)
I was blown away last night by a comment a lady made to me. She said “I’ve been in Church 37 years and I’ve never heard this taught this way. I thought it was about money”.
Just an example of not studying the Word for ourselves, especially the context.
OK, I’m ranting again aren’t I? Sorry.
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 10:04 am
Darren, I agree completely. It’s easy to parrot what you’ve been taught by others, but much more difficult to study out the issues for oneself. As someone once said, if two people agree on everything, one of them is not thinking. Jason
LikeLike