Every election year we hear a lot about “undecided voters.” After debates, everyone is talking about how the debate might have influenced the undecided voters. Why are voters undecided? It seems to me that there are only three reasons someone might be undecided:
- They are political novices
- They don’t know the positions of the candidates/parties
- They haven’t developed a taxonomy of values
Anyone who has a developed taxonomy of values knows which issues are the most important, and anyone who is not a political novice knows where each candidate/party falls on those issues because the two parties are at opposite ends of the spectrum on almost all issues: economic, foreign policy, domestic policy, and moral/social.
So why are these people undecided election after election? I think the main reason is #3: they have yet to figure out where they stand on certain issues, or if they have, they have yet to figure out how to rank the issues according to importance. They like the fact that candidate A believes Q, R, and S, and the fact that candidate B believes T, U, and V, but don’t know how to prioritize Q, R, S, T, U, and V to determine which issues matter most when choosing a candidate.
Sadly, I think many Americans vote for presidents based on superficial criteria such as how they look, how well they speak, and whether they “connect” with the man on a human level. Indeed, a few celebrities even acknowledged that they are voting purely on race. Looks, speech, and how well a candidate relates to the public are important factors, but not at the expense of substantive and important ideas. We need to be informed on the issues, where the candidates and parties stand on those issues, and know which issues carry more weight than others. Don’t be an undecided voter!
October 5, 2012 at 5:36 am
I spoke to someone yesterday at work about the election. She told me that she is voting for Obama, because Romney grew up wealthy and Obama grew up poor, so she can relate to Obama better. That was the only thing she knew about either candidate. Sad.
LikeLike
October 5, 2012 at 10:12 am
Agree.
LikeLike
October 7, 2012 at 2:45 am
I think you forgot apathy. Many are undecided simply because they haven’t decided to care enough to decide.
LikeLike
October 9, 2012 at 2:47 pm
There are also those in the “undecided voter camp”
who have had clear political opinions in the past and have
subsequently voted for the candidates of their choice.
There are those amongst this group that are not political novices, that do know the positions of the candidates/parties, and have developed a taxonomy of values,neither are they apathetic.
Some are very active in other substantive ways as it relates to social issues.
Some are undecided because they are questioning the
very institution that they have previously participated in.
They are questioning whether or not Government,
either party, or their vote really matters or can truly make a difference.
Due to the historical ills that exist in Government,
they have a lack of faith in the political process that they have
previously participated in.
LikeLike
October 9, 2012 at 3:08 pm
The people you are describing, Milton, sound more like people who are undecided if they want to participate in democracy, not undecided about who the best candidate is. That is not the kind of undecided voter I am referring to. Most undecided voters can’t decide who to vote for, not whether or not they want to vote.
LikeLike
October 17, 2012 at 1:22 pm
I wouldn’t make that broad of a generalization.
They have and do want to participate in democracy,
they just believe that our “democracy” is not a “true” democracy
but a “mixed democratic” comprised of
oligarchic ,aristocratic, and democratic forms of government.
They believe that our government
has been corrupted by lobbyist, special interest groups, fiscal greed,etc.
They can’t decide who to vote for because
they believe both the Democratic and Republican candidates
(and their parties) represent a “tainted” form of “democracy”
which will ultimately render their vote for either mute and impotent.
In their mind they don’t see a “best” candidate” they see the “same” candidate because both candidates and their parties are controlled by lobbyist, special interest groups, fiscal greed. (i.e. at the and of the day they’re all on the same team)
I do hear your point.
LikeLike
November 25, 2012 at 7:19 am
I don’t think it’s simply an analysis of the issues. We live in a republic, not a direct democracy. The candidates will decide various issues using information that isn’t publicly available, and will address issues we cannot foresee (eg, 9/11 in 2001).
Furthermore, the winner could affect the 2014 elections. A Romney election might have killed off the Tea Party, while Obama’s re-election will keep the Tea Party strong through 2014.
Finally, if you believe the economy will strengthen or weaken over the next four years, you need to decide which party you want to get the credit or blame. (Eg, you might believe the economy will return to recession and want the Obama Democrats to get the blame for it.)
LikeLike