Indiana Governor, Mike Pence, has signed legislation that prevents anyone (individuals, business owners, organizations) from being forced to violate their conscience and religious convictions (what the bill calls “exercise of religion”). One would think the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be enough to secure these rights, but not these days. While the historical context of the bill is surely recent examples in which business owners have been forced by state governments to offer their services to homosexuals in ways that violate their conscience and religious convictions, the bill does not make any reference to homosexuality in particular. It is a general protection religious freedom.
This bill will prevent Jewish publishers from being forced by law to print anti-Jewish propaganda, gay sign-makers from being forced to make signs that condemn homosex, and Christian business owners from being forced by law to provide services that violate their religious convictions. Like it or not, agree with it or not – that is true freedom of conscience and freedom of religion.
You can read the text of the law here. An excellent legal analysis can be found here.
March 27, 2015 at 9:56 am
I would guess your opinion would have been very popular during “separate but equal” times in America. My friend, you are a disgrace, and the opinions you hold about people is a disgrace.
LikeLike
March 31, 2015 at 11:16 pm
[…] those who are reacting so negatively to the Indiana religious freedom law, do you not realize what you are saying (even if not explicitly)? You are saying that people should […]
LikeLike
April 9, 2015 at 5:36 pm
KBM, all you have proven is that you are good at name-calling but not at arguments. Please tell me why we should deny people their first amendment rights and require them to violate their conscience. Are you also prepared to require a homosexual filmmaker to direct a film that argues homosexuals are perverts that should be killed, or would you say that filmmaker should not be required to participate in something he finds morally objectionable?
Jason
LikeLike
April 9, 2015 at 6:06 pm
People using First Amendment rights to exercise religious beliefs has nothing to do with violating their conscience; r3eligious beliefs have nothing to do with conscience, it i has only got to do with the indoctrination they allow themselves to be subjected to from ancient stoneage men who practiced child murder as an exercise of religous freedom, who burned witches as religious freedom, that enslaved others as religous freedom. Religious freedom merely allows every behavior imaginable for proponents to engage in with impunity.
LikeLike