Oddly enough, I don’t have much to say about Bruce Jenner. Others have provided excellent commentary and I don’t feel the need to add to the mix. What I will say is that my heart goes out to the man. I cannot imagine what it is like to feel like you are a woman trapped in a man’s body. While I think his decision to alter his body to make it look like a female’s body is a tragic one, I understand why he would do so. He is trying to look like what he thinks he truly is, and he thinks that these alterations will make him happy. Unfortunately, I think he’ll find out too late that it won’t bring him the happiness he thought it would, and he may even come to regret the decision. While we should be firm in our convictions and position that his actions are wrong, we should never do so at the expense of his humanity. He is a person. A confused person. A lost person. A person who needs love, and not just words of moral condemnation. This is a time that we need to proclaim the truth, but proclaim it with compassion and love.
What I would like to focus my attention on is why our culture is divided on the issue of transgenderism and gender-reassignment, and then show how the logic of the liberal view is applied inconsistently.
Why the divide?
When it comes to transgenderism, the divide between conservatives and liberals centers on where they locate the problem, and what they identify as the solution. Is the problem with the body (liberals) or the mind (conservatives)? Is the solution changing the body (liberals) or changing the mind (conservatives)?
Liberals argue that one’s true identity is not determined by one’s biology, but by one’s self-perception and self-determination. If a gendered male thinks he is a woman, then he is a woman regardless of the biological and anatomical evidence. The solution to the tension between his mind and his body is to surgically and chemically manipulate the body so that it fits the mind.
Conservatives, on the other hand, argue that one’s gender identity is determined by their biology rather than their self-perception or desire to be something else. If a gendered male thinks he is a woman, the fact remains that he is still a man because the biological and anatomical evidence is clear that he is a male. The solution to the tension between his mind and his body is psychological therapy so that his self-perception can be realigned with biological reality. Mutilating his body to make it appear like a woman’s body no more makes him a woman than surgically attaching feathers to his body would make him a chicken. You will always be a man and your DNA proves it.
The Transabled and Liberal Inconsistency
The liberal support of transgenderism and gender reassignment is inconsistent with their position on the transabled. Transability, more technically known as Body Integrity Identity Disorder, is a mental illness in which people perceive themselves to have a physical disability despite the fact that their body is perfectly healthy. For example, a woman with perfectly functioning legs may perceive herself to be a cripple, and she has a strong desire to cripple her legs so that they will not work. Or a man may perceive himself to be an amputee, and has a strong desire to have his arms surgically amputated so that he can become his true arm-less self. Someone else may perceive their true self to be blind, and desire to be made blind by a medical doctor so that they can fulfill their true identity.
Sane people rightly define this as a psychological disorder, and seek to help the person via psychological counseling. The goal of the counseling is to bring their minds into conformity with their physical reality. Virtually no one thinks the real problem is with their body, and the solution is to mutilate their body so that their body can match their mind’s self-perception. But why not? That’s the solution liberals advocate in the case of transgenderism. When the mind conflicts with a perfectly healthy body, they cheer on the person’s decision to mutilate their body so that it conforms to the mind and makes the person happy. So why object to the man who wants a doctor to amputate his healthy arm or blind a healthy eye if that will make him happy? Either the mind’s self-perception always trumps biological reality or it does not.
If we see that something is wrong with the mind of the transabled, we should equally see that something is wrong with the mind of the transgendered. If the proper solution for the transabled is to adjust their minds to fit biological reality, then the solution for the transgendered is to adjust their minds to fit biological reality as well. Both psychological conditions are a travesty, and both are reason for us to reach out in compassion to help those who suffer from them. But we lack compassion when we affirm a person’s mental delusions as normal, and cheer on their decision to mutilate their body to conform to their mental delusion. This is not compassion, but abandonment.
See also “Gender is not a social construction”
June 4, 2015 at 7:17 pm
Jason:
I commend you for expressing empathy toward Bruce Jenner — Call Me Caitlyn. Many are not so advanced to even go that far. I do think however that Caitlyn would have appreciated the sentiment more fully if you had said “my heart goes out to the woman.” trapped inside a man’s body.
As the process proceeds and surgery replaces Nature’s error from male to female we can be amazed that man can correct the anomaly defect and put things right as it were.
While there are millions of gestational anomalies in the world, the majority will never experience that world of conflict, humility, uncertainty and yes even shame from the greater society but with understanding we can discern truth and empathize accordingly with the forces of reality and tolerance.
LikeLike
June 4, 2015 at 9:04 pm
On the other hand those with the notion that they know Absolute Certainty because of the religious reins they hold are themselves afflicted with a form of mental illness accepting dogma passed on by stoneage Ancients’ Absolutism when it is impossible to know what that even means.
So what did the Ancients do to right the wrongs of society? kill and sprinkle the blood of the victims for the remission of sins even if the victim was their own child, practice exorcism, in exhortation to the demons, to come out of the epileptic, use magic tricks and call them miracles to convince others that they actually represent the Gods and the One True God, believe it or not, was among the last God man invented as ancient mythology shows the extent of rampant imagination in a pattern that has been recurring since the advent of religion tens of thousands of centuries ago as amply substantiated by the historical record.
“So why object to the man who wants a doctor to amputate his healthy arm or blind a healthy eye if that will make him happy?” Now there’s one dumb analogy since there is nothing healthy about a man trapped in a woman ‘s body and a woman trapped in a man’s body, not because of a “mind” perception but a “brain” perception, a big difference when trying to slant the anomaly as a psychological problem.
So-called sane people justify genital mutilation, in both men and women: circumcision in men demanded by god for man and demanded by men for women. Female genital mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting and female circumcision, is the ritual removal of some or all of the external female genitalia. And then those “sane” men complain that a woman who has been a woman all her life in secret wants to look like a woman and a man who has been a man all his life, in secret, wants to look like a man.
LikeLike
June 6, 2015 at 8:26 pm
Jason,
My heart goes out to those in this situation.
I haven’t had the time to thoroughly research transgenderism yet, but it seems to me most Western males after surgery to become women have sexual relationships with women. Where most males in Thailand after surgery to become women have sexual relationships with men. Transgenderism also seems very popular in Thailand. This is just anecdotal evidence based on TV documentaries so I’m not sure of the actual statics. Have you seen any studies on this?
Paul
LikeLike
June 7, 2015 at 4:25 pm
Jason:
“Unfortunately, I think he’ll find out too late that it won’t bring him the happiness he thought it would, and he may even come to regret the decision.”
Unfortunately for you, Jason, “you think” is the problem; but cannot “know” that from walking in your shoes what somebody else’s life will be like walking in their shoes. And so you suggest a judgment about another person’s happiness and suggest s/he may regret the decision based only on the “walk in your shoes”.
True empathy requires you to take off your shoes and then you may have the capacity to actually “empathize”. You said have nothing to add to the commentary: “Oddly enough, I don’t have much to say about Bruce Jenner. Others have provided excellent commentary and I don’t feel the need to add to the mix.” and then proceed to add almost a thousand words about the matter. What is that all about?
Before you judge someone, ask yourself if you know this person inside out and if you know what made them the person that they are today. If you can understand what they go through day after day, if you can relate to them and what it must feel like to be in their position, then you can form an opinion about them, without being biased. Notwithstanding, it should be noted that unless you really experienced the exact same situation as another person, with the same burdens, problems and suffers, you should ask yourself if you are in the proper position to judge or even criticize this person.
I submit, Jason, that you are not in that position and you are out of line with your commentary not only because you lack empathy but you are out of libnne even after you said you have nothing to add to the commentary except a thousand more words.
Sane people do not attribute this to a psychological disorder, religious people do. Religious people form the majority of hypocrites when it comes to gender identity because they can only walk in dogma-de shoes.
LikeLike
June 7, 2015 at 4:26 pm
LikeLike
June 8, 2015 at 5:17 am
The Take Away – Given Jason’s view on this matter, to call Bruce Jenner (AKA Caitlyn) a woman would be inconsistent with the view that he is a man who is confused regarding his gender and is now in a mutilated man’s body.
Jason – A very good piece and I had not really heard about transabled. Don’t suppose you know the % on sufferers (and compare to transgendered)?
LikeLike
June 8, 2015 at 7:46 am
scottspeig:
It may be inconsistent with Jason’s view and the view of many religious believers who are on the wronf side of history but in my view and in the view of 60% of the American population polled, it is a medical intervention to right the mistake that nature made, no different from required surgery to repair cleft lip and cleft palate to correct nature’s mistake. Only religious types and people because of religious influence are confused about Caitlyn’s gender; Caitlyn Jenner is not confused about her gender and that’s what counts here regardless of what sins others convict her of.
On the other hand one can just as glibly say that every circumcised male is living in a mutilated man’s body, FMG notwithstanding.
When you think that a few degrees difference in gestation(incubation) re male or female determinant in reptiles do you imagine that human gender is so simple arrived at? The gender identity of a person is the final result of genetic, hormonal and morphologic sex. It also includes all behaviour, such as body gestures and mannerisms, way of speech, sexual preferences and content of dreams. Particularly, gender identity is the result of the genetic sex, the gonadal sex, the internal genitalia, the external genitalia, the secondary sexual characteristics that appear in puberty and the social gender that is attributed in accordance with the norms and the beliefs of the social body.
There is evidence that the embryonic brain is also sexually differentiated. The influence of the hormones on the central nervous system has a potential effect on the patterns of the hormone secretion and sexual behaviour on the adult.
The problem with religious believers is that the only sex they know is the social determinant by what religion has taught them from the bible; other than that sexual conversation is for blushing, stuttering and hiding it as a secret sinful act and why all the Messengers of God must bypass the sexual act for conception and be birthed by virgins or like Buddha: ” Later, when she gave birth to the child, instead of experiencing pain the queen experienced a special, pure vision in which she stood holding the branch of a tree with her right hand while the gods Brahma and Indra took the child painlessly from her side.”
Religious civilization is not a progressive force, it is a regressive force; it does not give impetus, it retards. Thank goodness and humanity the world is civilizing not because of religion but in spite of it.
LikeLike
June 8, 2015 at 8:10 am
scottspeig:
There’s a Story on Transabled in the National Post you may read about this “new” phenomenon: There is no equation between transabled and transgender anymore than there is an equation between suicide and homicide.
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/becoming-disabled-by-choice-not-chance-transabled-people-feel-like-impostors-in-their-fully-working-bodies
LikeLike
June 9, 2015 at 4:56 am
TTA: Isn’t the issue though that the body is not “corrected” in that the DNA still reads male/female, reproductive organs cannot be transferred etc and so the body does not change gender (even though it looks like it has).
Moreover, once the surgery has occurred, there is no return. And so we ought to try psychotherapy first.
LikeLike
June 9, 2015 at 11:17 am
I mainly have a problem with Jenner being married three times and fathering 6 children. Except for that I would consider it genuine and support. But he proved he was a man doing that for over 40 years.
I complement the makeup artist on their work as well. But Jenner will not look like that on a daily basis. Not only trying to be the opposite sex towards the end of life but trying to recover youth that cannot be.
LikeLike
June 10, 2015 at 9:25 pm
scottspeig:
I agree the body is not corrected although I believe there are gestational problems at play that interferes with growth. For example
Does having a Y chromosome make someone a man? If the Y is not activated by the SRY genes DNA will show a female based on the X factor or rather based on the non activation of the Y factor.
A lot of unintended harm happens when people assume a Y chromosome makes a person a boy or a man and the lack of a Y chromosome makes a person a girl or a woman. For example, one physician educator on our Medical Advisory Board had the challenging experience of trying to calm a 23-year-old patient who had just been told by a resident that she was “really a man” because the resident had diagnosed the patient as having a Y chromosome and complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS).
It is true that in typical male development, the SRY gene on the tip of the Y chromosome helps to send the embryo down the masculine pathway. But more than the SRY is needed for sex determination and differentiation; for example, women with CAIS have the SRY gene but lack androgen receptors. In terms of hormone effects on their bodies (including their brains), women with CAIS have had much less “masculinization” than the average 46,XX woman because their cells do not respond to androgens.
Moreover, the SRY gene can be translocated onto an X chromosome (so that a 46,XX person may develop along a typical masculine pathway), and there are dozens of genes on chromosomes other than the X and the Y that contribute to sexual differentiation. And beyond the genes, a person’s sex development can be significantly influenced by environmental factors (including the maternal uterine environment in which the fetus developed).
So it is simply incorrect to think that you can tell a person’s sex just looking at whether he or she has a Y chromosome.
Sometimes this SRY releases the protein that activates the Y chromosome that is dysfunctional or non functional that interferes with the masculinity path in which case in the absence of activation produces female traits because the Y chromosome fails or is delayed in activation.
” the hormone chiefly responsible for determining the male brain pattern is estradiol, a type of estrogen.* Testosterone in fetal or neonatal blood can be converted into estradiol by the enzyme P450 aromatase, and this conversion occurs in the hypothalamus and limbic system—two areas of the brain known to regulate hormone secretion and reproductive behavior (Reddy et al. 1974; McEwen et al. 1977). Thus, testosterone exerts its effects on the nervous system by being converted into estradiol. But the fetal environment is rich in estrogens from the gonads and placenta. What stops these estrogens from masculinizing the nervous system of a female fetus? Fetal estrogen (in both males and females) is bound by a-fetoprotein. This protein is made in the fetal liver and becomes a major component of the fetal blood and cerebrospinal fluid. It will bind and inactivate estrogen, but not testosterone.
Certain behaviors are often said to be part of the “complete” male or female phenotype. The brain of a mature man is said to be formed such that it causes him to desire mating with a mature woman, and the brain of a mature woman causes her to desire to mate with a mature man. However, as important as desires are in our lives, they cannot be detected by in situ hybridization or isolated by monoclonal antibodies. We do not yet know if sexual desires are primarily instilled in us by our social education or are fundamentally “hardwired” into our brains by genes or hormones during our intrauterine development or by other means.
In 1991, Simon LeVay proposed that part of the anterior hypothalamus of homosexual men has the anatomical form typical of women rather than of heterosexual men. The hypothalamus is thought to be the source of our sexual urges, and rats have a sexually dimorphic area in their anterior hypothalamus that appears to regulate their sexual behavior. Thus, this study generated a great deal of publicity and discussion. The major results are shown in Figure 17.14. The interstitial nuclei (neuron clusters) of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH) were divided into four regions. Three of them showed no signs of sexual dimorphism. However, one of them, INAH3, showed a statistically significant difference in volume between males and females; it was claimed that the male INAH3 is, on average, more than twice as large as the female INAH3. Moreover, LeVay’s data suggested that the INAH3 of homosexual men was similar in volume to that of women and less than half the size of heterosexual men’s INAH3. This finding, LeVay claimed, “suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.”
There have been several criticisms of LeVay’s interpretation of the data. First, the data are from populations, not individuals. One can also say that there is a statistical range and that men and women have the same general range. Indeed, one of the INAH3 from a homosexual male was larger than all but one of those from the 16 “heterosexual males” in the study. Second, the “heterosexual men” were not necessarily heterosexual, nor were the “homosexual men” necessarily homosexual; the brains came from corpses of people whose sexual preferences were not known. This brings up another issue: homosexuality has many forms, and is probably not a single phenotype. Third, the brains of the “homosexual men” were taken from patients who had died of AIDS. AIDS affects the brain, and its effect on the hypothalamic neurons is not known.
Fourth, because the study was done on the brains of dead subjects, one cannot infer cause and effect. Such data show only correlations, not causation. It is as likely that behaviors can affect regional neuronal density as it is that regional neuronal density can affect behaviors. If one interprets the data as indicating that the INAH3 of male homosexuals is smaller than that of male heterosexuals, one still does not know whether that is a cause of homosexuality or a result of it. Indeed, Breedlove (1997) has shown that the density and size of certain neurons in rat spinal ganglia depend on the frequency of sexual intercourse. In this case, the behavior was affecting the neurons. Fifth, even if a difference in INAH3 does exist, there is no evidence that the difference has anything to do with sexuality. Sixth, these studies do not indicate when such differences (if they exist) emerge. The question of whether differences among the heterosexual male, female, and homosexual male INAH3 occur during embryonic development, shortly after birth, during the first few years of life, during adolescence, or at some other time was not addressed.
In 1993, a correlation was made between a particular DNA sequence on the X chromosome and a particular subgroup of male homosexuals: homosexual men who had a homosexual brother. Out of 40 pairs of homosexual brothers wherein one brother had inherited a particular region of the X chromosome from his mother, the other brother had also inherited this region in 33 cases (Hamer et al. 1993). One would have expected both brothers to have done so in only 20 cases, on average. Again, this is only a statistical concordance, and one that could be coincidental. Moreover, the control (the incidence of the same marker in the “nonhomosexual” males of these families) was not reported, and the statistical bias of the observations has been called into question, especially since other laboratories have not been able to repeat the result (Risch et al. 1993; Marshall 1995). More recent studies (Hu et al. 1995; Rice et al. 1999) found little or no increase in the incidence of this DNA sequence when homosexual men were compared to their nonhomosexual brothers. Hu and colleagues concluded that this sequence is “neither necessary nor sufficient for a homosexual orientation.” Thus, despite the reports of these studies in the public media, no “gay gene” has been found.
Genes encode RNAs and proteins, not behaviors. While genes may bias behavioral outcomes, we have no evidence for their “controlling” them. The observance of people with schizophrenia, or people whose personalities change radically after a religious conversion or a traumatic experience, indicates that a single genotype can support a wide range of personalities. This is certainly a problem with any definition of a “homosexual phenotype,” since people can alternate between homosexual and heterosexual behavior, and the definition of what is homosexual behavior differs between cultures (see Carroll and Wolpe 1996). Thus, whether homosexual desires are formed by genes within the nucleus, by sex hormones during fetal development, or by experiences after birth is still an open question. ▪
An open question allows me to give the benefit of the doubt to the persons affected without being judgmental.
LikeLike
June 14, 2015 at 10:06 pm
Paul,
No, I have not seen any studies on the rate of transgenderism in different countries or the sexual preferences of those who are transgender.
Jason
LikeLike
June 14, 2015 at 10:07 pm
Scottspeig,
I don’t know the precise numbers, but this article, http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/becoming-disabled-by-choice-not-chance-transabled-people-feel-like-impostors-in-their-fully-working-bodies, makes it sound like it’s not very many.
Jason
LikeLike
December 30, 2016 at 9:00 am
[…] person who is experiencing mental and emotional confusion (I’ve written some on gender issues here and here). They need therapy, not gender reassignment surgery. But what about a person who was […]
LikeLike