Conservatives have long argued that the legalization of same-sex marriage will likely lead to the eventual legalization of polygamy because the same principles used to argue for same-sex marriage apply equally to polygamy. Liberals tended to say this was nonsense. Now that same-sex marriage is the law of the land, however, they are beginning to talk more openly about the legalization of polygamy.
In the New York Times, William Baude asks this very question:
With same-sex marriage on the books, we can now ask whether polyamorous relationships should be next. There is a very good argument that they should. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell did not focus primarily on the issue of sexual orientation. Instead, its main focus was on a “fundamental right to marry” — a right that he said could not be limited to rigid historical definitions or left to the legislative process. That right was about autonomy and fulfillment, about child rearing and the social order. By those lights, groups of adults who have profound polyamorous attachments and wish to build families and join the community have a strong claim to a right to marry.
Baude’s point is clear: Whether the majority opinion intended it or not, it has set up the legal precedent and legal logic to legalize polygamy. He thinks polygamy could be legalized in 20-40 years. I wouldn’t bet on it. If I had to make a prediction, I would say polygamy will be legal in all 50 states in the next 5-10 years. The handwriting is on the wall.
For additional reading:
- Legalize polygamy!
- Please tell us, counsel, why polygamy is not next?
- The Challenge Bisexuals Pose to Common Same-Sex Marriage Arguments
July 30, 2015 at 7:52 pm
Apples and oranges. Most people believe sexual orientation is not a choice while polygamy is a choice. Wait and see. Polygamy will never reach the supreme court because the lower courts will not rule polygamy is a right. There will be a few lawsuits claiming states must allow polygamy, and the federal judges will rule against. Randy
LikeLike
July 30, 2015 at 7:52 pm
It’s sad to say that you are probably right. Once gender has been seen as irrelevant to the marriage equation, then talk of limits on numbers and even species (!) goes out the door… 😦
LikeLike
July 31, 2015 at 5:07 am
The courts will treat polygamy differently. The states have an interest that would be much more clear to the Justices. The Justices found no overriding state interest in denying same sex marriages and believed the expressed interests of the states were contrived to cover discriminatory bias. They would see that polygamy causes real concerns for the states with regard to inheritance rights, pensions, property issues, etc., etc.
When you take the legitimate concerns of Christians about same sex marriages and bootstrap those concerns to a fear that the courts will legalize polygamy and marriage to animals, you are missing the Supreme Court’s point regarding anti- discrimination laws.
And, I think you are wrongly slandering the Supreme Court. The Justices are extremely bright individuals who are trying to do what they think is best. We Christians do not always agree but it is wrong, and not Christ- like to attack them. Read what Paul has to say about following our leaders and what Daniel had to say about all leaders are there by appointment from God Almighty.
Jesus’ kingdom is not of this world. Remember?
You are right about one thing. Some man will try to marry his horse. He will find the one attorney out of about a million who would take such a demand to court. And, the Federal Judge will throw them both out of court.
Randy
LikeLike
July 31, 2015 at 11:10 am
Religion was and is responsible for polygamy as God’s Will for the Patriarchs. (Mormons saw their practice of polygamy as similar to that of the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.) From the Old Testament scriptures prominent men in the Old Testament were polygamists. Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, Esau and others all had multiple wives. (King David, the “man after God’s own heart,” had eight wives). Religion has always advocated gender inequality and even persists to this very day in many religious quarters. It seems almost “out of character” for believers to be concerned about legalization of polygamy.
Polygamy can be of two types. One is polygyny where a man marries more than one woman, and the other is polyandry, where a woman marries more than one man. In Islam, limited polygyny is permitted and polyandry is completely prohibited.
Polygyny is permitted in Judaism. According to Talmudic law, Abraham had 2 wives, and Solomon had hundreds of wives. The practice of polygyny continued till Rabbi Gershom ben Yehudah. (960 A.D to 1030 A.D) issued an edict against it. The Jewish Sephardic communities living in Muslim countries continued the practice till as late as 1950, when an Act of the chief Rabbinate of Israel extended the ban on marrying more than one wife.
Many Hindu religious personalities, according to their scriptures, had multiple wives. King Dashrat, the father of Rama, had more than one wife. Krishna had several wives. In earlier times, Christian men were permitted as many wives as they wished, since the Bible puts no restriction on the number of wives.
Hindus are more polygamous than Muslims but oddly enough the Qur’an is the only religious book, on the face of this earth, that contains the phrase ‘marry only one’. There is no other religious book that instructs men to have only one wife. In none of the religious scriptures like the Vedas, the Ramayan, the Mahabharat, the Geeta or the Bible does one find a restriction on the number of wives. According to these scriptures one can marry as many as one wishes. It was only later, that the Hindu priests restricted the number of wives to one. And It was only a couple of centuries ago that the Christian Church restricted the number of wives to one.
Regardless of religion or legality, polygamy is doomed as common place simply because of the passion involved (jealousy) involved in our humanity. Granted there are cases of infatuation that would lead to accept sexual sharing because the bond that actual consummates marriage is indeed the essence and meaning of marriage itself. Trust, love and honor, upon which relationships are bonded and forged will trump deceit, unrequitedness and scorn.
Know your Humanity for it is the Uniter of Humans.(HUH) The seat of the soul is emotion and the seat of emotion is the soul; they are one and the same.
Body, Soul and Spirit = Mind, Emotion and Will.
LikeLike
July 31, 2015 at 11:18 am
Randy:
I think you forgot to include the word religious.
“Most (RELIGIOUS) people believe sexual orientation is not a choice…….”
LikeLike
August 3, 2015 at 10:27 pm
Whether sexual orientation [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_identity] be by choice —
“To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether … ” [http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/36560-to-be-or-not-to-be-that-is-the-question]
LikeLike