Liberals love to label those who have ethical objections to cloning, doubts about man-made global warming, and the like as “science deniers” and “climate change deniers.” Matt Walsh suggests that we start calling those who deny that one’s biological sex determines their actual gender as “biology deniers.” And in this case, the term is an accurate description rather than a derogatory, non-descriptive insult. Those who want to normalize transgender thoughts are truly denying biology. They affirm that someone who is biologically male is actually female.
Transgender advocates aren’t the only biology deniers. So are abortion advocates. They deny the biological fact that the unborn are human beings from the moment of conception.
So the next time you meet someone who is arguing for abortion or transgenderism, ask they why they are a biology denier.
Thinking to Believe 
February 14, 2017 at 1:09 pm
That’s a ridiculous argument given all the abnormalities that children are born afflicted with. Are you a biology denier because children are born with brain damage, down syndrome, missing limbs, cleft palate, cleft lip, malformed body parts and physical defects, MS, leukemia and other rare and not so rare diseases, epilepsy etc.?
You also need to remember that the abortions you attempt from happening will inevitably include homosexuals, transgenders and a whole host of peculiar societies that you are not only deniers of but reject as despised communities among you.
Jesus was rejected abused and crucified simply because he had a perspective that walked on well treaded toes or religious insanity when demonic was the religious diagnostic catch all terms along with sins of the father unto third and fourth generations.
LikeLike
February 14, 2017 at 3:07 pm
It’s not an argument. It’s an observation. And it’s not ridiculous. Those who deny that the unborn are human and those that deny that biological men are gendered males are denying biology. Your supposed parallel of diseased people isn’t parallel and doesn’t make any sense.
LikeLike
February 14, 2017 at 9:20 pm
“Your supposed parallel of diseased people isn’t parallel and doesn’t make any sense.”
Of course it makes sense….why do you suppose the homosexual community is any less an abnormality, than other “normal” abnormalities from birth?
LikeLike
February 14, 2017 at 11:39 pm
People born with missing limbs are not denying that they have missing limbs, and those who observe them do not affirm that it is normal. But people are denying that people born with a male body are actually male, and calling their psychological state normal. This is completely disanalogous.
LikeLike
February 15, 2017 at 5:59 am
People born with a female brain and male genitalia/male brain and female genitalia do not deny they are born that way(other than when the community ostracizes them), and heterosexuals observing them do not affirm it is normal. We do not say that a person born with missing limbs is normal but we do affirm that people born with missing limbs is not an unusual occurrence and do affirm that a state of biological dysfunction has occurred.
Nobody knows how to reinstate the psychobiological dysfunction but they do know how to reverse the physical appearance to match the brain function and while we do not yet know how to grow new limbs yet, prosthetic limbs are a normal solution. This is completely analogous.
The only reason people do not accept the biological dysfunction of LBGT is because they want to claim it is a lifestyle choice and therefore lay the blame as a behavioral dysfunction rather than a biological dysfunction and in so doing this excuses them from belittling the “gay” just as kids belittle the disabled and mock people with deformities. Adults are just big kids doing the same thing because you have not learned to accept humanity’s freckles.
This is so completely logical to anybody with compassion and even more so with women than with men.
LikeLike
February 15, 2017 at 6:05 am
How many poor suckers are out there
fulfilling daily quotas and unable to do
anything about it…it’s understandable why these
people would have a hatred for those
who perpetuate the hoax to justify their work….
…Are these people sick with their own sense
of worth and value? Are they diseased with their own
self-righteousness? It seems to me, they are.
I think how hypocritical the “powers to be” are; how they
heap accolades and good words upon you when
you’re dead but when you are alive, they trash you. You may
have heard recently about Bob Tillman, the NFL Player
who two years ago turned down his 3.5 million contract
to join the army. After he was killed in Afganistan
the whole country heaped accolades on
him…a hero…almost god-like. And I imagine that
Martha Stewart would have gone down in history as a
wonder woman for all her achievements if she had died
before the stock fraud incident..she would have been a
true American Hero. Even Princess Diana was a hero in
death and a whore in life according to the trashers.
Yes, showered with flowers in death and treated like
scum in life…the way of the world.
LikeLike
March 21, 2017 at 1:20 pm
ANALYSIS Science confirms that human life begins at fertilization
By Luke Faulkner | March 1, 2017 , 09:04pm
http://www.liveactionnews.org/science-confirms-that-human-life-begins-at-fertilization/
From the above article by Luke Faulkner:
The scientific community continues to prove that human life begins at conception (fertilization).
In their latest edition of The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, professors Keith Moore, TVN Persaud, and Mark Torchia shed significant light on the development of the human person – and they don’t shy away from the reality of when life begins.
James Bopp powerfully summarizes the beginning of life, and the stages that follow, in Human Life and Health Care Ethics, Vol. 2:
“The first cell of a new and unique human life begins existence at the moment of conception (fertilization) when one living sperm from the father joins with one living ovum from the mother. It is in this manner that human life passes from one generation to another. Given the appropriate environment and genetic composition, the single cell subsequently gives rise to trillions of specialized and integrated cells that compose the structures and functions of each individual human body.
“Every human being alive today and, as far as is known scientifically, every human being that ever existed, began his or her unique existence in this manner, i.e., as one cell. If this first cell or any subsequent configuration of cells perishes, the individual dies, ceasing to exist in matter as a living being. There are no known exceptions to this rule in the field of human biology.”
LikeLike
November 11, 2017 at 3:18 pm
Yikes. Ignorance is real. Gender is a social construct. Search it up. Search up the range of communities and cultures that recognised sex and gender are two different things. It’s not just a modern 21st century thing. Gender as a social construct has been here a lot earlier. Gender = sociological/psychological. Sex = biological. That’s not denying biology. We aren’t denying there are two sexes. Therefore we’re not denying biology.
Secondly, YOU are denying biology because a Zef (zygote, embryo, foetus) is NOT a human being. A human being is a BORN child, woman or man. A fertilised egg is NOT a human being and never will be. Yes, a life starts at conception. No one is denying that. But a Zef is not a human being. It’s only human.
So, next time you talk shit online, make sure you know the difference between sociology, biology and psychology. Because they’re different fields. Gender =/= sex. Zygote, embryo, foetus =/= human being. Deal with it.
LikeLike