We’re living in a time when people tend to isolate themselves intellectually. Not only do they not take it upon themselves to search out viewpoints that differ from their own, but they actually shun people who do not agree with them. We see this all the time on social media. You post something that person X does not agree with. Rather than reading what you have to say and starting a dialogue regarding your differences in hopes of helping each other discover the truth, person X ignores the post, or worse yet, unfriends you.
This sort of behavior is consistent with our cancel culture, but frankly, it is childish and foolish. I use these words advisedly, not as a smear. This is childish because only children plug their ears when they don’t want to hear what you have to say, not sensible adults, and thus when adults engage in this kind of behavior they are literally acting childish. This is foolish because this sort of behavior makes it impossible for one to grow intellectually. Everyone has false beliefs. The only way to discover which of our beliefs are false and correct those beliefs is to be open to listening to alternative viewpoints. If we ignore alternative viewpoints and shun those who hold to them, we stunt this process, guaranteeing that we will not grow in our knowledge of truth and wisdom.
When you encounter someone who refuses to discuss something with you simply because they do not want to hear a contrary view, or unfriends you because you disagree with their viewpoint, ask them the following three questions:
- Do you think it’s possible that you could be mistaken regarding this issue?
- If you were mistaken, would you want to know it?
- [Assuming they answered affirmatively to the first two questions] If you realize you could be wrong, and you would want to know it if you were, how do you expect to achieve that goal if you cut off dialogue with anyone with whom you disagree?
Virtually everyone will answer the first two questions affirmatively. We recognize we could be wrong and we desire to know the truth, but how can we accomplish that goal if we ignore views that are contrary to our own and excise people from our life that hold views differing from our own? We can’t. The only way we can identify and correct our false beliefs is to listen to those who differ from us. It is only through dialogue that we can inch our way closer to the truth.
Truth is our goal, and the only way to get there is if we dialogue rather than cancel.
September 8, 2020 at 2:50 pm
well said but that’s the problem ……… they don’t even consider they could be wrong & they want to remain in their delusion.
I’ll use the BLM/defund the police as an example —– on youtube you can see videos of people “protesting” to defund the police scream call 9-1-1 when a person, in their opinion, does something that scare them. hilariously — they can’t see their error.
LikeLike
September 9, 2020 at 5:37 pm
This is a most interesting topic; particularly because it actually speaks to this website.
I remember the time when there were lots of commentators and comments on this blog and it was very interesting to read the various ideas; some purely Christian type and some not so Christian type; in fact, some of the best dialogue I have read on Christian blogs were from posters on this blog who spoke from in the spirit; not in your spirit necessarily, but in their spirit. However, so many times the die-hard lot, stiff-necked as the bible calls them, who refused to listen to what they were saying who made themselves blind to their dialogue incessantly yapping that they were off-topic; that is to say of the topic the die-hards wanted to speak and sheriff the rebels, refusing to hear them.
In other words, they were barred or banned, denigrated, or otherwise made to sound like fools by the fools who refused to hear engage their spirit and now all those posters are gone and this website resembles a ghost town with tumbleweeds rolling in the wind like a rudderless ship on the sea, a hen-scratching for posters. Why? Oh, I’m sure you can and will, justify the weeding of your garden because it is YOUR garden after all.
When this was all happening, I never said anything about it. I never squawked about it to be seen as just another squawker so I didn’t say a word but I saw the dissembling before my very eyes and one by one, the exciting posters stopped posting and now only rarely does a topic pop up that invites simulated thoughts that of course could never stray from the myopism of the topic, and topics became impotent like a barren thesaurus that refused to hear or offer any other synonyms. And so what did this site do?
“Truth is our goal, and the only way to get there is if we dialogue rather than cancel.”
Really?
You practiced something other than what you now preach: you canceled the posters instead of dialoguing with them:
The way you treated some posters and allowed those who would treat them with disdain to gain presumptive Theo. brownie points reminded me of a scriptural lamentation of which you may remain blind and not want to see the parallels.
“Jerusalem, Jerusalem! You kill the prophets and kill with stones those men God sent to you. Many times I wanted to help your people! I wanted to gather them together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings. But you did not let me. Now all you have left is your house, desolate. I tell you that you will never see me again till the day when you cry, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!’”
You now own a Theosophical Ghost Town in which you are the only ghost that haunts it; ah maybe, a sycophant or two to please the ego; but the spirits stir no more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 17, 2020 at 2:38 pm
The lady doth protest too much, methinks. On occasion I have been confused as to why certain postings were deleted. However, for the most part, it has been my observation that the Cancelled have been those who wish to dazzle the rest of us with long winded, off topic dissertations on their opinions or beliefs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 19, 2020 at 5:45 pm
Regarding “ablyreasoned”‘s comment, all I can say is, in my opinion, the few times I have offered an opinion it was ALWAYS ignored. Why? Maybe bad grammar, syntax (only cuz I don’t know what that is) or simply “lack of volume” to be paid attention to but, All I know is this: I worked hard to contribute to the discussion (because this looks like a great place to discuss ideas) and, in the end, it has always been for naught. So… I’ll simply fade away as usual.. when “given” the usual.
Really wish this wasn’t a “ghost blog”, because there was a lot to be gained once. Till it was revealed there isn’t.
LikeLike
September 23, 2020 at 8:40 am
Methinks the lady is the infamous and deleted LTG otherwise known as Leo otherwise known as the self-proclaimed “SonofMan”.
Good disguise Leo …. hahaha
Naz
LikeLike
September 28, 2020 at 10:01 am
Methinks the lady is LTG otherwise known as Leo or the so-called “SonofMan”.
Naz
LikeLike
September 28, 2020 at 10:05 am
I’m not sure but it looks like I’ve been blocked. Please confirm, and if so I will gladly vacate. I’m not looking for trouble.
Naz
LikeLike
September 28, 2020 at 11:11 am
Nope
LikeLike
October 3, 2020 at 8:03 pm
In my experience, those who react defensively and thereby shut down discussions are insecure about their ability to successfully defend their views. Most people don’t spend time considering counter arguments and nuances to their beliefs. They’re content to pursue other interests while using their presuppositions as useful templates for their lifestyles. People in leadership that they both respect and trust hold the same positions, so they see no need to abandon something that’s been both useful and ingrained with many of life’s most cherished experiences. They live by the dictate that so long as they’re not hurting anybody, they’re free to hold to their traditions—to each his own!
Problems arise when, as Jason points out, folks use various platforms to excoriate those who do not share their beliefs. They attempt to shame, ostracize and demonize all who dissent. It matters nothing to them that they’re incapable of cogently arguing in favor of their views, much less rebut rejoinders. “Since you disagree with me, you must be evil incarnate, so I must do my part to destroy you,” as many of them seem to say. Though that may provide a sense of righteousness, it is certain to trigger a proportional reaction from their opponents. And that, of course, will lead to violence.
Our reasoning ability is what sets us apart from the animal kingdom. Since we are all fallible, it’s possible that some or all of our beliefs are unsupported by the facts. That’s why our learning institutions should provide an environment where different perspectives are welcome and that we maintain an open mind when it comes to challenges to our philosophical templates. Someone once said, “In a controversy, the instant you feel anger, you have ceased striving for the truth and have begun to strive for yourself.” Now, I understand that righteous anger has its place, but as a general rule, these are words to live by. Am I defending a principle or am I defending my ego? Am I trying to save face or toe the party line? Am I really striving to attain the truth?
@Bob Mason—You’re correct. Jason has banned very few participants. You really, REALLY have to get under his skin to get banned. He likes a free exchange of ideas, so long as they’re on topic! I don’t think that Jason as ever had an open thread (like we do on our blog, so perhaps he should add one now and then. That said, he’s introduced a wide variety of topics, so there’s almost something for everyone who’s philosophically minded. Regrettably, he allowed his site to be taken over by several trolls who used his platform as a quasi-Facebook. The hammer needed to be brought down, and he finally did so a little while back. It was a necessary flushing.
As to the current traffic, the only reason there’s not more activity is Jason’s inability to produce posts. As a blog moderator myself, producing quality posts is time-consuming. So, the busier you are, the less likely you’ll produce the number of posts to keep discussions rolling. As I understand it, Jason attends a very large church. Perhaps there are a couple of people he trusts who could help keep this site active. Even if he can’t find anybody in his local assembly, there are surely quite a few people across the Jesus’ name fellowship who’d like to contribute to the conversation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 8, 2020 at 7:14 pm
I’m sorry, Scalia. I tried accessing your blog, but the URL seems to have an error upon opening it.
LikeLike
December 17, 2020 at 12:09 pm
Sorry about that, Bro. Andrew. The link works in my browser, so it may either be a browser issue or one of your security settings.
LikeLike