When it comes to contentious issues, we rarely have genuine conversations regarding them. Most “conversations” are just opportunities for each person to express their own point of view. Neither person does much listening to the other, and neither expects to learn anything from the exchange. Their only goal is to declare their point of view, and perhaps convince the other person in the process.
This is not a good approach. We should come to every conversion believing that the other person has something to offer. We should be listening, not just making points. After all, we could be wrong in what we believe, wrong about particular facts, etc. Our “opponent” may actually have insights that we could benefit from, so we should be open and ready to be corrected if necessary.
Conversation should not be a contest of intellects, but a pursuit of the truth. Unfortunately, people are resistant to acknowledging that they are wrong. They want to appear smart and save face. To avoid this, you could start off the conversation by saying something like, “I don’t see this as a contest or intellectual battle. My goal is simply the truth. I’ll give you my reasons for what I believe, and then you can critique them. If you have a good point, I’ll give you credit for it and consider it. I hope you’ll do the same. When this is over, perhaps we’ll both have something to think about.”
Commonly, while one person is talking the other person is thinking about how they will respond rather than focusing on what the person is saying. One tactic to avoid this and get your “opponent” to focus on your argument is to say, “Let me explain my way of thinking on this. When I am done, perhaps you can summarize what I’ve said so that I know I have communicated my view to you sufficiently.”
Here are some other tips for an engaging conversation as opposed to a contest of minds:
- Ask a lot of questions. Get clarity on both what your opponent believes, as well as why he believes it.
- Keep calm. The minute you start raising your voice or get angry, everyone loses.
- Do not dominate the conversation. Give your opponent equal time to speak.
- Do not interrupt. This can be difficult if you are engaging someone who likes to dominate the conversation, however. To avoid this, address the issue in advance. Perhaps you could say, “Nobody likes to be interrupted. If you can agree to speak for just a minute or two and then let me respond, I will not interrupt you while you are speaking. And I’ll extend the same courtesy to you. Agreed?”
If you practice these tips, your conversations will be more fruitful.
If you have additional tips to offer, please share them in the comments.
October 24, 2020 at 8:23 am
You are correct on all counts. However, there is a bit of idealism involved in your point. It seems that it is assumed that all parties are of the same gentlemanly disposition and temperament, and both are well-informed objective thinkers. Rarely is that the case. Such thinkers/speakers/debaters are not easy to find today. Lincoln and Douglas are ancient history. Culture has forced most of us into a one-round bout where one has to come out swinging at the bell or step out of the ring. Debates are like pro fights, the decision is based on a K/O or on points made. That is where we are in the dog-eat-dog world of media-run politics. Even theological debates have a difficult time staying with ideal, truth uncovering procedures and manners. Sad, isn’t it?
JREnsey
LikeLike
October 26, 2020 at 6:55 am
Excelente. Realmente nuestro ego puede cegarnos y hacernos creer que tenemos “la verdad” sin considerar si estamos equivocados. Muchas de nuestras creencias, ni siquiera son nuestras, sino “creencias de otras personas que nos las han enseñado y defendemos como nuestras”. No asumo que estén mal las creencias que tradicionalmente nos han enseñado, pero debemos dejar espacio a la interpretación y búsqueda de establecer nuestras convicciones, solo así no nos moveremos junto a cualquier corriente de doctrina que desee arrastrarnos.
LikeLike
October 29, 2020 at 12:20 pm
Jerry, it is true that dialogue is more difficult these days. That’s precisely why I offered this post. It contains tactics for helping us reel loose canons back in. It’s no guarantee that the conversation will be fruitful, but it makes is much more likely.
LikeLike
October 29, 2020 at 10:49 pm
I also agree that it is rare to encounter balanced, stable, rational thinking people today, especially online. Most that I have dialogued with were quick to make accusing comments, repeat false information about Trump or some other person, bold to act as if they were speaking sound truth, and unforgiving towards anyone who dared to correct them of even tell them that they were incorrect. The norm today seems to be, if you don’t agree with my lie, you are the enemy and you must be silenced. Healthy discussion and exchange of different views and convictions is hard to find. I think it is because of the influence of leftists education in our lower and higher education, and in media and entertainment, including Hollywood. Honesty and critical thinking with ethical intentions are rare. It seems only True Christians who really love God and His word are willing to have rational meaningful conversations with the goal of better understanding of the truth. Last Days indeed.
LikeLike