Based on my research, if you have been infected with COVID-19, there is no good reason for you to get vaccinated. Getting Covid provides you with a natural immunity to future reinfections that is thousands of times more effective than the immunity conferred by the vaccines. Also, the vaccines fare no better than natural immunity at preventing the transmission of Covid. Let me explain.
Personal protection
Studies have shown that those who become infected with Covid develop a natural immunity that lasts for at least 7-8 months, and most likely, years to come. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded a study that was published January 6, 2021 in Science.[1] Speaking of this study, the NIH writes: “But, promisingly, their levels [of antibodies] remained fairly stable over time, declining only modestly at 6 to 8 months after infection. …. 95% of the people had at least 3 out of 5 immune-system components that could recognize SARS-CoV-2 up to 8 months after infection.”[2] A decline in antibodies does not mean that immunity is diminishing rapidly over time. Immunologist Scott Hensley, of the University of Pennsylvania, notes that “[i]t doesn’t mean that those people no longer have antibodies. It doesn’t mean that they don’t have protection.”[3]
A British study published in The Lancet found that “a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an 84% lower risk of infection, with median protective effect observed 7 months following primary infection. This time period is the minimum probable effect because seroconversions were not included. This study shows that previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces effective immunity to future infections in most individuals.”[4] And again: “After 7 months of follow-up, this large observational study showed that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection protects most individuals against reinfection for an average of 7 months. We have identified and investigated more potential reinfections than reported in the global literature to date…. This study supports the hypothesis that primary infection with SARS-CoV-2 provides a high degree of immunity to repeat infection in the short to medium term; with similar levels of prevention of symptomatic infection as the new licenced vaccines for working-age adults.”[5] In other words, natural immunity is comparable to vaccine-induced immunity. As I’ll discuss later, this is an understatement. Natural immunity is way more effective than vaccine-induced immunity.
While both studies could only show natural immunity for 7-8 months, this doesn’t mean natural immunity only lasts for 7-8 months. This timeframe is only a reflection of how much time had passed since the participants in the studies had recovered from Covid. One of the authors of The Lancet study, Shane Crotty, specifically noted that the “amount of [immune] memory would likely prevent the vast majority of people from getting hospitalized disease, severe disease, for many years.”[6] Ecologist John Drake, of the University of Georgia, estimates that natural immunity could last as long as 4.7 – 8.4 years based on The Lancet study’s data.[7] Last year, researchers found that those infected by the original SARS-CoV virus still have a natural immunity 17 years later.[8]
Do the vaccines provide a longer immunity against Covid? No one knows for sure[9], in part, because the vaccines are so new, and because the vaccines are not 100% effective at preventing infection. We know that ~10% of those who get vaccinated will still contract the virus (and that number is likely to increase as time elapses).[10] When a vaccinated person gets infected, it would be difficult to determine if they did so because they were part of the 5-6% for whom the vaccines fail, or if they got infected because the vaccine-induced immunity against Covid had worn out. All we know at this point is that the antibodies created from the Pfizer vaccine are still robust after six months.[11] As of now, we have no reason to believe that vaccine-induced immunity will last any longer than naturally occurring, virus-induced immunity.
Social transmission
Until now, I have focused on comparing the effectiveness of natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity for preventing one from personally contracting Covid in the future. But some might wonder if the vaccine is more effective than natural immunity at preventing the transmission of Covid to someone else? Could an immunized person A encounter infected person B, not contract Covid from B, and yet transmit B’s Covid to healthy person C? No. There is no evidence to support the idea that Covid can be transmitted from a sick person to a healthy person via an intermediary. Covid is only transmitted directly from an infected person to a healthy person. A person with a natural immunity to Covid could only transmit Covid to others if he was personally reinfected with Covid.
How likely is that? Very unlikely. According to the CDC, “[c]ases of reinfection of COVID-19 have been reported but are rare.” The precise number of reinfections is hard to pin down for a variety of reasons[12], but there are only 72 confirmed cases in the world according to one tracker (and 44 more from an English study[13]), and at best, 40,000 additional suspected cases.[14] Compare this to the number of infections that will be experienced by the vaccinated. If ~10% of the vaccinated will still contract Covid, this means millions of vaccinated will still get Covid. Approximately 355 million people have been fully vaccinated worldwide as of May 17.[15] Statistically speaking, ~35,000,000 of them will contract Covid. That’s tens of thousands compared to tens of millions.[16] Clearly, one is much safer being around those with a natural immunity to Covid than those with a vaccine-induced immunity.
Natural immunity offers more protection against Covid than virus-induced immunity
This also shows why natural immunity confers more protection against Covid than the vaccines. Approximately 161,000,000 people across the globe have contracted Covid and survived. If a maximum of 40,000 got reinfected with Covid, that would mean natural immunity failed to prevent future Covid infections just 0.025% of the time. Compare this to vaccines which fail to prevent Covid .0.037% – 0.078% of the time.[17] That means natural immunity is at least 1.4x – 3x better at preventing a future Covid infection than vaccines. Given the fact that we only know of 116 confirmed cases of reinfection, natural immunity is even stronger. Even if we generously inflate this number up to 500, this would give us a reinfection rate of just 0.00031%. That’s 119x – 252x better at preventing a future Covid infection than vaccines. Even if the Covid vaccines end up being more effective than the trials indicated, they will still pale in comparison to natural immunity.
If you want to follow the science, there is no reason to think those who have already been infected with Covid need to get a Covid vaccine. And given the fact that more than 1/3 of Americans have gotten Covid, that means more than 1/3 of Americans are already immune to getting reinfected with Covid in the future.[18]
___________________________
[1]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33408181/
[2]https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19
[3]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/health/coronavirus-antibodies-studies.html
[4]https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00675-9/fulltext
[5]https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00675-9/fulltext
[6]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/health/coronavirus-immunity.html
[7]https://www.forbes.com/sites/johndrake/2021/04/15/how-long-does-immunity-to-sars-cov-2-last/?sh=66e63dc2f376
[8]https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z
[9]https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-long-do-covid-19-vaccines-provide-immunity-11618258094
[10]https://www.healthline.com/health-news/pfizer-and-moderna-covid-19-vaccines-are-90-effective-in-real-world-setting
[11]https://www.wsj.com/articles/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-protects-for-six-months-companies-say-11617273901?mod=article_inline
[12]https://www.statnews.com/2021/04/07/covid-19-reinfections-still-seem-rare/
[13]https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249642v1
[14]https://bnonews.com/index.php/2020/08/covid-19-reinfection-tracker/
[15]https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations?country=OWID_WRL
[16]There is evidence to suggest that when people are reinfected, the symptoms are less severe than the first time.
[17]Based on the Moderna phase 3 trial data. While the vaccine efficacy was shown to be 94.1%, that doesn’t mean 6 out of every 100 people get Covid. Rather, it means vaccinated people are 94% less likely to get Covid than unvaccinated people. For example, if unvaccinated people had a 50% chance of getting Covid, a person with the Moderna vaccine would only have a ~3% chance of getting Covid. Out of 14,134 people in the Moderna trial who received the vaccine, only 11 got Covid, which is 0.078% of the population. See https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/providers/clinical-trial-data. The Pfizer vaccine was found to be 95% effective in phase three trials. Only eight of the 21,720 vaccinated persons got Covid (0.037%). See https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-announce-publication-results-landmark.
[18]See the CDC’s estimates at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html. As of June 16, 2021, the webpage indicates that there have been 114.6 million Americans infected between February 2020 and March 2021.
May 27, 2021 at 10:18 am
I am happy to say that both my husband and I got the Wuhan Virus back in January 2021.
There will be no way that we will get any of these experimental drugs injected into our bodies….not even if we had not contracted the Wuhan Virus.
Best advice is, take Zinc, Vitamin D, Sambucus, Elderberry every day and if per-chance you still get the Wuhan Virus, it will probably affect you as a light case of the flu like it did us.
Otherwise, if you start to experience symptoms a little worse, contact American Frontline Doctors and get a prescription for Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin…….these are known cures for the Wuhan Virus.
Remember, the Wuhan Virus has a 98% recovery rate.
This is why our AMAZING President Trump recovered so excellently from the Wuhan Virus….he was able to take the correct Meds….Thank You Jesus!
LikeLike
June 3, 2021 at 9:59 pm
Found an article that talks about a study in Denmark showing only 6/10 of 1% of healthcare workers who had Covid previously, got reinfected.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/johns-hopkins-professor-one-of-the-biggest-failures-of-our-current-medical-leadership-is-ignoring-natural-immunity
LikeLike
June 3, 2021 at 10:11 pm
My husband and I got the Wuhan Virus in January 2021 and it was like a mild flu and the only annoying issue was loss of sense of taste & smell for awhile…but we are 100% fine now….plus now we have the antibodies which is far better than some experimental vaccine which is not approved by the FDA.
So whether we had gotten the Wuhan Virus or not, we would still NOT be getting vaccinated.
Absolutely no reason to get vaccinated…instead, take Zinc, Vitamin D and Sambucus Elderberry Gummies……and if per-chance you do get the Wuhan Virus, contact American Frontline Doctors for a prescription of Ivermectine or Hydroxychloroquine.
It’s a SURE cure and the recovery rate of the Wuhan Virus is 98.8%
The families of the people who died from the Fauci-financed CCP Laboratory-made Wuhan Virus should sue the pants off of that WICKED man and I hope he goes to prison for the rest of his life…along with the de-populate-king Bill Gates.
LikeLike
June 16, 2021 at 4:44 pm
Another article talking about why those who recovered from Covid do not need the vaccine: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-aggressive-push-vaccinate-natural-immunity/
LikeLike
June 16, 2021 at 5:01 pm
NO!!!! They do not (such as my husband & I who had the Wuhan Virus in Jan 2021) need to get vaccinated and neither does anyone else.
You get sick with “covid?”….order Ivermectin and you are fine…..period….end of story.
Fauci and Gates need to go to prison for the blood they have on their hands.
PS – TRUMP WON!!!! 🙂 🙂 🙂
LikeLike
June 16, 2021 at 11:21 pm
The Cleveland Clinic has released a study showing that those who’ve had Covid will not benefit from the vaccine: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v2.full.
LikeLike
July 9, 2021 at 1:54 am
More on the Cleveland Clinic study…
The study found that those who were previously infected with COVID-19 have an immunity against COVID-19 on par with those who have been vaccinated (and have never been infected by COVID-19). The study was based on more than 52,000 healthcare workers. 2579 had previously been infected by COVID-19, and 1359 of those people were not vaccinated. None of the 1359 got infected by COVID-19 during the study (December 2020 through May 2021). Of the 22,777 vaccinated individuals with no prior COVID-19 infection, 15 got COVID-19 (0.0066%).
At first glance, this seems to show that those with prior infections had a greater immunity than the vaccinated. However, we are comparing two groups of different sizes. The vaccinated group was 16.76 times larger than the previously infected unvaccinated group. That means that all things being equal, we should expect the previously infected unvaccinated group to experience one COVID-19 infection for every ~17 COVID-19 infections in the previously uninfected vaccinated group. Instead, we see zero infections among the previously infected but unvaccinated group. The difference between zero infections and one infection may not be statistically significant. While this does not show that the previously infected but unvaccinated have a better immunity against COVID-19 than the previously uninfected but vaccinated, it does indicate that both groups have a similar immunity. The study concluded, “Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before.”
As for the previously uninfected and unvaccinated, 2139 of the 26,882 participants got infected with COVID-19 (~8%). This group is very similar in size to the previously uninfected but vaccinated group, demonstrating how effective the vaccines were at preventing COVID-19 infections.
How long does natural immunity last? “This study was not specifically designed to determine the duration of protection afforded by natural infection, but for the previously infected subjects the median duration since prior infection was 143 days (IQR 76 – 179 days), and no one had SARS-CoV-2 infection over the following five months, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection may provide protection against reinfection for 10 months or longer. … Duration of protective immunity from natural infection is not known. However, the same also can be said about duration of protective immunity from vaccination. Uncertainty about the duration of protective immunity afforded by natural infection is not by itself a valid argument for vaccinating previously infected individuals. This study provides direct evidence that vaccination with the best available vaccines does not provide additional protection in previously infected individuals.”
LikeLike
August 16, 2021 at 5:47 pm
From the CDC on the most recent research:
“In today’s MMWR, a study of COVID-19 infections in Kentucky among people who were previously infected with SAR-CoV-2 shows that unvaccinated individuals are more than twice as likely to be reinfected with COVID-19 than those who were fully vaccinated after initially contracting the virus. These data further indicate that COVID-19 vaccines offer better protection than natural immunity alone and that vaccines, even after prior infection, help prevent reinfections.
“If you have had COVID-19 before, please still get vaccinated,” said CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky. “This study shows you are twice as likely to get infected again if you are unvaccinated. Getting the vaccine is the best way to protect yourself and others around you, especially as the more contagious Delta variant spreads around the country.”
The study of hundreds of Kentucky residents with previous infections through June 2021 found that those who were unvaccinated had 2.34 times the odds of reinfection compared with those who were fully vaccinated. The findings suggest that among people who have had COVID-19 previously, getting fully vaccinated provides additional protection against reinfection.
Additionally, a second publication from MMWR shows vaccines prevented COVID-19 related hospitalizations among the highest risk age groups. As cases, hospitalizations, and deaths rise, the data in today’s MMWR reinforce that COVID-19 vaccines are the best way to prevent COVID-19″: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0806-vaccination-protection.html
More detail here: https://www.healthline.com/health-news/people-whove-had-covid-19-should-still-get-vaccinated-heres-why
Also, keep in mind that 96-99% of those hospitalized with COVID, and over 99% of those dying from COVID, are unvaccinated: https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187 and https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/covid-unvaccinated-dc-maryland-virginia/2021/08/11/f8071702-fa04-11eb-8a67-f14cd1d28e47_story.html
LikeLike
August 16, 2021 at 11:02 pm
I read the Kentucky study last week. Before I address that study in particular, let me ask you what you think follows from this. Let’s say that the Kentucky study made valid assumptions and the conclusions can be extrapolated beyond Kentucky. What do you think this does to all of the other studies that show natural immunity is at least as good as, if not better than vaccine immunity? Do you just dismiss the Science study? Do you just dismiss the Lancet study? What about the Cleveland Clinic study? What about the Israeli study that found those with natural immunity to have a protection that was 6.72 times better than the vaccinated? Do you just dismiss all of these studies, some of which are based on a huge number of participants, all because of the Kentucky study? That would be irresponsible.
Should we also dismiss common sense? The vaccines can only train your body to develop an immune response to a tiny portion of the SARS-CoV2 virus: the spike protein. Natural immunity develops an immunity to the entire virus. That’s also why natural immunity will prove to be more effective against variants. All it takes is a little too much change in the DNA of the spike protein and the vaccines cease to be effective. It would take a lot more mutations for those with natural immunity to fail to fight off the virus. Indeed, this is what we are seeing. New data from the Mayo Clinic is suggesting that Pfizer is only 42% effective against the Delta variant while Modern is 76% effective (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707v1.full.pdf). That’s a huge drop in effectiveness.
As for the Kentucky study itself, it is very limited. The conclusions were based on just 246 people. More importantly, because they didn’t do any genetic sequencing, they don’t know if the reinfections were from the original Covid virus or one of the new variants such as delta. If they were largely from the delta variant, that would simply show that the delta variant is sufficiently different from the original so as to reduce effectiveness. The researches also acknowledge that the greater likelihood of reinfection among the previously infected may just be the result of a testing bias. Vaccinated people are less likely to get tested for Covid because they think they couldn’t get Covid after getting vaccinated. If they got infected but did not get tested, it would artificially skew the numbers. While I think this study is important, it has severe limitations and cannot outweigh all of the other data we have in far superior studies.
I don’t deny that the vaccines are effective in lowering the hospitalization and death rate for those who get Covid (and to clarify, the vaccines don’t stop people from getting Covid, but stop them from getting severely sick and dying). They are (or at least have been) quite effective in that area. I said “or at least have been” because data coming from other parts of the world is showing that vaccines are not as effective as they once were. In places like Scotland and Israel, the vaccinated are experiencing higher hospitalization and death rates than the unvaccinated. 87% of deaths in Scotland are among the vaccinated. A british navy ship had a 100% fully vaccinated crew, and yet 100 of them got Covid (a 1:1620 rate, which is the highest in the world).
LikeLike
September 2, 2021 at 11:10 pm
The latest evidence for the superiority of natural immunity comes from a large-scale Israeli study based on over 778,000 people. They found that those with vaccine immunity (Pfizer) are up to 13x more likely to get Covid-19 (delta variant) than those with natural immunity, and 27x more likely to get a symptomatic infection. See https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full-text
To their shame, many employers are demanding that their employees get vaccinated. If they were following the science, however, at the very least they should allow exceptions for the previously infected. A failure to do so reveals their ignorance or their socio-political bias.
LikeLike
September 6, 2021 at 2:39 pm
“Let’s say that the Kentucky study made valid assumptions and the conclusions can be extrapolated beyond Kentucky. What do you think this does to all of the other studies that show natural immunity is at least as good as, if not better than vaccine immunity? Do you just dismiss the Science study? Do you just dismiss the Lancet study? What about the Cleveland Clinic study? What about the Israeli study that found those with natural immunity to have a protection that was 6.72 times better than the vaccinated?”
It’s not about how many studies there are, it’s about the quality of the studies. There are sometimes conflicting results in research because they study different aspects of the disease. That’s why grasping at one or another study isn’t the wisest way to figure out how best to follow a scientifically responsible course of action. The best sources are the actual experts: the virologists, epidemiologists and immunologists. Not Facebook. Not Reddit. Not Fox News. And the experts pretty much unanimously agree that it’s better to get the vaccine even if you’ve already had COVID.
The problem with the claims about post-COVID immunity being superior to vaccine immunity is that there is insufficient evidence for the former. The bottom line is no one knows how long it will last, and mild cases often confer many fewer antibodies. And since the vaccine is safe and effective, the CDC recommends getting vaccinated even if you’ve already had COVID. Every major medical organization and information source agrees with this assessment (e.g., https://www.mayoclinic.org/coronavirus-covid-19/vaccine-if-already-had-covid, https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/publications/p03038.pdf, https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/do-i-need-a-vaccine-if-i-had-covid, https://www.webmd.com/coronavirus-in-context/video/vaccination-after-infection, https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/media-resources/science-in-5/episode-50—do-i-still-need-the-vaccine-if-i-have-covid-19, https://www.healthline.com/health-news/people-whove-had-covid-19-should-still-get-vaccinated-heres-why, etc.). The evidence indicates that the vaccines are effective for at least eight months and can be extended with a booster. You can’t do the same with the actual virus without putting your life and the lives of others at risk.
The vaccines are available for free, side effects are minimal, serious side effects are extremely rare, and they certainly beat the much higher level of risks associated with catching the virus (which also, unlike the vaccine, you can pass on to other people). So why wouldn’t one get the vaccine? Why put yourself and your community at risk? Why ensure that the virus will continue to circulate and evolve into ever-more transmissible and dangerous strains? It boggles the mind. You don’t run into people with mumps anymore. Or polio. Or rubella. Or smallpox. And so on. We have vaccines to thank for that.
LikeLike