Women often wonder what men are thinking about. Jerry Seinfeld once joked that the answer is, “Nothing.” For the past several weeks, I too, have been thinking about nothing – not nothing as in “not anything,” but nothing as in the concept of nothingness. What is nothing? Is it possible that there could have been nothing rather than something? If so, why is there something rather than nothing?
What is Nothing?
Nothing is a very difficult concept to wrap one’s mind around. As A.J. Ayer pointed out, we are often fooled by the grammar of nothingness into think that since “nothing” is a noun, it must refer to something.
But “nothing” is a term of universal negation, not a term of reference. It’s similar to words like “no one ” and “nowhere.” “Nowhere” does not refer to a place, but to the absence of any place (not anywhere). Likewise, “nothing” does not refer to something, but to the absence of anything (not anything). If someone asked you what you had for lunch today, and you say “nothing,” you don’t mean you had lunch, and what you ate was called nothing, but rather that you did not have anything for lunch. If they ask you what nothing tasted like, tell them, “Chicken, of course.”
The minute we begin to think about nothing, we mentally transform nothing into a something; an object to be contemplated. It is even impossible to imagine nothingness, because every image we conjure up is an image of something. We often imagine nothing as an infinite expanse of black, empty space (a vacuum) – but empty space is something, not nothing. Nothing is “not-even-space.” Nothing is not a little bit of something, or “something-lite,” but literally no-thing; the absence of being. Perhaps Macbeth said it best when he said, “Nothing is but what is not.” It is the absence of any and every existent, including the very concept of existence. Could this kind of nothing “exist”?