I posted back in October that I was starting a podcast series on the resurrection of Jesus. That series is still on-going. Right now I’m in the midst of a sub-series focused on explaining so-called contradictions in the Gospels, particularly in the empty tomb, resurrection, and post-mortem appearance narratives. I spent three weeks laying the foundation for how we ought to approach and understand Gospel differences. The episode to be released this Friday will start to explore specific examples of differences in the empty tomb narratives. Check it out wherever you get podcasts, or at https://thinkingtobelieve.buzzsprout.com.
Hermeneutics
February 5, 2025
Contradictions in the Gospels?
Posted by Jason Dulle under Apologetics, Bible, Bible Difficulties, Hermeneutics, Historical Jesus, Resurrection, Theology1 Comment
June 5, 2024
A departure from doctrinal tradition is a mark against one’s view
Posted by Jason Dulle under Hermeneutics, Miscellaneous, Theology[16] Comments
The truth of a doctrine is not determined by its age or by a historical consensus, and yet we naturally assign great weight to doctrinal tradition. After all, there’s something to be said for a historical consensus, and it should not be dismissed lightly. We should not ignore the understanding and insights of the majority who have preceded us. And in general, we should not dismiss a doctrinal tradition unless we have compelling reasons to do so.
December 5, 2022
Did Jesus Offer a Bad Argument for the Resurrection?
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Bible Difficulties, Hermeneutics, Resurrection, Theology[12] Comments
In Jesus’ debate with the Sadducees, He defended His position that there will be a resurrection of the dead by quoting Exodus 3:6. Luke records Jesus as saying, “But even Moses revealed that the dead are raised in the passage about the bush, where he calls the Lord the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. Now he is not God of the dead, but of the living, for all live before him.” (Luke 20:37-8, NET).
Jesus’ argument seems to be as follows:
(1) God can only be “the God of…X”, if X exists
(2) God identified Himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob centuries after their death
(3) Therefore, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob still existed when God spoke to Moses
I find two problems with this line of reasoning.
June 10, 2022
When the theological tail wags the hermeneutical dog: “Nothing shall separate us from the love of God”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Calvinism v Arminianism, Hermeneutics, Theology[14] Comments
It’s amazing to me how we can interpret a passage to mean almost the exact opposite of its intended meaning simply because the intended meaning seems to conflict with our theology. A great example of this is Paul’s teaching in Romans 8:35-39:
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? 36 As it is written,
“For your sake we are being killed all the day long;
we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.”
37 No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. (ESV)
October 5, 2021
The True Meaning of Hypocrite
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hamartiology, Hermeneutics, Holiness, Theology[4] Comments
People often misunderstand and misapply the term “hypocrite.” A hypocrite literally refers to an actor. They are pretenders. In the realm of morals, a hypocrite is someone who pretends to be moral. They tell you not to do something, but have no intention of following their own commands. They are people who do not think their own rules apply to them. They might pretend to keep these rules, but secretly they flout them.
On the other hand, there are those who believe the moral commands they preach to others apply equally to themselves, and they do their best to live up to those moral ideals. However, they fail to do so perfectly or consistently. When they fail their moral standards, they regret it and repent. These people are not hypocrites. They are simply fallen humans doing their best to do what’s right, but failing to do so perfectly.
July 19, 2021
Straight outta context #25 – Matthew 3:11 – baptism of fire
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hell, Hermeneutics, TheologyLeave a Comment
I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. (Matthew 3:11)
While most people rightly understand the baptism of the Spirit as a reference to regeneration, there is no shortage of interpretations of what the “fire” refers to.
Some understand this as referring to two separate Spirit baptisms for believers: the baptism of the Spirit is for salvation (regeneration), while the baptism with fire is an empowerment for ministry. Others agree that “fire” refers to anointing and empowerment, but only see one baptism in view. When we receive the Spirit, we experience both salvation and ministry empowerment simultaneously. An appeal is often made to Acts 2:1-4, where fire appeared over the disciples when they were filled with the Spirit.
July 1, 2021
Straight Outta Context #24 – 2 Tim 1:6 – the gift of God
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology1 Comment
I am reminded of your sincere faith, a faith that dwelt first in your grandmother Lois and your mother Eunice and now, I am sure, dwells in you as well. 6 For this reason I remind you to fan into flame the gift of God, which is in you through the laying on of my hands, 7 for God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and self-control. (2 Timothy 1:5-8, ESV)
What is the “gift of God” that Paul enjoined Timothy to fan into flame? Many interpreters, including Pentecostals, tend to view this gift as the gift of the Holy Spirit that we see in the book of Acts. I’ve heard a number of messages about stirring up the Holy Spirit inside of me, based on this verse. It’s not hard to see the connection. The laying on of hands is associated with receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit in Acts 8:17-18 and 19:6, and this experience is intimately connected with “power” being given to the believer (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:8; 4:33; 6:8; 10:38).
While this is a plausible interpretation, I do not think it is the best. Let’s consider other possibilities. (more…)
June 3, 2021
Thinking + Jesus = Understanding
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[6] Comments
When it comes to Biblical interpretation, some tend to think that they don’t need to study or engage in deep thinking on the Scripture. God will simply tell them what the Bible means. On the other end of the spectrum are those who tend to think that they don’t need any spiritual illumination of the text. They can discover the meaning through study and deep thinking alone.
Paul rejected both of these approaches to Scripture. He told Timothy, “Think over what I say, for the Lord will give you understanding in everything” (2 Tim 2:7). Paul didn’t see it as an either-or, but a both-and. We must do our best thinking on the words of Scripture, and Jesus will help us understand Scripture in the process.
May 18, 2021
Straight Outta Context #23 – 1 Cor 3:10-17 – Building on the foundation
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[6] Comments
I am temporarily reviving an old series I did on hermeneutics called “straight outta context.” For this installment, I want to look at 1 Corinthians 3:10-17.
According to the grace of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and someone else is building upon it. Let each one take care how he builds upon it. 11 For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw— 13 each one’s work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. 14 If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. 15 If anyone’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire. 16 Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you? 17 If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy him. For God’s temple is holy, and you are that temple. (1 Cor 3:10-17)
I had always heard verses 10-15 used to exhort people to good works. As Christians, we need to make sure that we are doing works that will endure for eternity (gold, silver, precious stones) and for which we will receive a reward, rather than doing things that have no eternal value (wood, hay, stubble). However, in context, this is Paul’s warning to teachers to make sure that they are discipling God’s people correctly.
January 27, 2021
Prayer and Biblical interpretation
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, TheologyLeave a Comment
I often hear people preface their wayward theological musings with, “I really prayed about this and did a lot of study.” If they are simply making the point that they did not come to their conclusions rashly, fine, but this sort of statement is often used as a justification for their theological conclusions. They are appealing to their prayer and study as reasons to accept their beliefs as true. This is mistaken. Prayer and study do not guarantee that one will come to the right conclusions. This should be evident from the fact that many people have given themselves over to much prayer and study regarding a particular issue, only to come to different conclusions. Prayer and study do not guarantee that you will come to the right conclusion, and surely they are not good reasons for others to trust your conclusions. All that matters are the reasons you offer for your conclusions. If your reasons are good, then your conclusion should be trusted. If your reasons are bad, then your conclusions should not be trusted. The same goes for your facts and presuppositions. Your conclusion will only be as good as the facts you considered and the presuppositions you bring to the question. I’m glad you prayed and studied, but I care more about your reasons than your investment and sincerity.
January 7, 2019
In the parting words of Paul’s first letter to the church at Thessalonica, he admonished them with several imperatives, including “pray without ceasing” (1 Thes 5:17).
Many Christians have struggled to make sense of Paul’s admonition because it’s evident that we cannot literally pray without ceasing. At the very least, we would have to stop praying when we go to sleep at night. Even if Paul was only talking about our conscious hours, one cannot pray while they are talking to other people, concentrating on their work, etc. Many Christians, wanting to affirm the sense of “continual prayer,” have taken this verse to mean that we should continually be in “a spirit of prayer.” This is often construed along the lines of always having a prayerful attitude even when we are not praying to God (which should be a frequent affair throughout one’s day). What exactly a prayerful attitude is, is not entirely clear. Others take it to mean that we should pray about everything.
March 8, 2017
Straight Outta Context #22 – Eph 5:21 – “submitting to one another”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[6] Comments
“…submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.” (Ephesians 5:21)
This verse is often invoked in the context of the marital relationship to teach against male headship. Rather than the wife submitting to the man, it is claimed that Paul argued for mutual submission: the wife should submit to her husband, but the husband should also submit to his wife. This principle is extended beyond the marriage relationship as well to include all Christians. Each Christian ought to submit themselves to each other.
Is that the point of this passage? Is Paul teaching that we should always yield our will to someone else’s will? I think not. While a look at the context will prove this to be so, common sense alone rules this interpretation out. Consider the following: (more…)
February 28, 2017
Straight Outta Context #21 – Prov 29:18 – “where there is no vision the people perish”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[2] Comments
For many years this proverb has been misinterpreted, probably because the KJV translates it “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” What we typically hear preached from this verse is that a church must have a long-term goal and plan if they wish to thrive rather than perish. That may be good advice, but that’s not the meaning of this proverb.
The word vision does not refer to one’s ability to formulate future goals and plans, but is a synonym for the prophetic word which comes from God’s prophets.
“Perish” has also been misunderstood. It’s not referring to churches that will cease to exist if they don’t have a vision, or to the spiritual perishing of unbelievers who will perish in hell if the church does not get a vision for the lost. The word means “to cast off all restraint.” The point of the Proverb, then, is that when there is no prophetic word from God to guide the people, they will cast off all moral restraint and follow their own evil devices.
Keep it in context….
February 16, 2017
Straight Outta Context #20 – Col 3:15 – “and let the peace of God rule in your hearts”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[6] Comments
Let the peace of Christ be in control in your heart (for you were in fact called as one body to this peace), and be thankful. (Colossians 3:15)
We have often interpreted this verse in an individualistic fashion to mean that each Christian should have peace in our heart. This verse is even appealed to in support of the teaching that intrapersonal peace in our heart is a means by which we discern God’s will for our life. Is this what Paul was conveying? Let’s look at the context. (more…)
February 3, 2017
Straight Outta Context #19 – 1 Jn 3:1, 4 – “greater is he who is in you” and “test the spirits”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, TheologyLeave a Comment
Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God… (1 John 4:1a)
… for he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. (1 John 4:4b)
Portions of 1 John 4:1-6 are often cited in discussions of spiritual warfare. John’s admonition to “test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (4:1) is cited as evidence that we need to exercise spiritual discernment to distinguish between angelic and demonic spirits, or even good and bad human spirits. “Greater is he who is in you than he who is in the world” (4:4b) is typically quoted in the context of overcoming the Devil. But are these passages being interpreted correctly? Are they referring to spiritual warfare? To find out, let’s look at the context. (more…)
January 17, 2017
Straight Outta Context #18 – Phil 4:13 – “I can do all things through Christ”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[20] Comments
I can do all things through him who strengthens me. (Philippians 4:13)
Some have called this the Superman verse. People invoke it to say that they can do anything and everything, as long as Christ is giving them the ability to do it. It’s a great motivational verse. As great as that message sounds, it’s not what Paul meant when you read the verse in its context.
I rejoiced in the Lord greatly that now at length you have revived your concern for me. You were indeed concerned for me, but you had no opportunity. 11 Not that I am speaking of being in need, for I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content. 12 I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need. 13 I can do all things through him who strengthens me. (Philippians 4:10-13)
Ben Witherington observes that the Greek does not say “do.” The only verb in the Greek is ischuo, which means “to be able, strong, healthy, valid, powerful.” A literal rendering of the verse is “I am able all things in Him who empowers me.” Read literally, it doesn’t make any sense. Able to do what? The helping verb is missing, and can only be supplied by the surrounding context.
January 10, 2017
Straight Outta Context #17 – Heb 12:15 – “root of bitterness”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[9] Comments
See to it that no one fails to obtain the grace of God; that no “root of bitterness” springs up and causes trouble, and by it many become defiled. (Hebrews 12:15)
The way I have typically heard this verse explained, the author is warning against the spiritual danger of harboring personal bitterness. Indeed, the Contemporary English Version interprets it this way in their “translation”: “Make sure that no one misses out on God’s wonderful kindness. Don’t let anyone become bitter and cause trouble for the rest of you.” Is that what the author meant to convey? Let’s look at the context. (more…)
January 3, 2017
Straight Outta Context #16 – Rom 8:28 – “all things work together for good”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, TheologyLeave a Comment
And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. (Romans 8:28)
This passage is typically used to teach that God will use the bad things that happen to us in life to bring about some future blessing (financial, relational, ministerial, etc.). Some go so far as to teach that each instance of suffering has a corresponding blessing attached to it. Let’s look at the context.
And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. 29 For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. 30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified. (Rom 8:28-30)
December 20, 2016
Straight Outta Context #15 – Col 2:8 – ‘don’t be taken captive by philosophy’
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[6] Comments
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. (Colossians 2:8)
On its face, these words of Paul to the church at Colossae appear to denigrate philosophy. For that reason, this verse has been one of the favorite verses by anti-intellectuals and those opposed to the study of philosophy. Philosophy, they say, is the not just worthless, but dangerous to the Christian faith. This would be a gross misreading of the text, however. We must pay attention to the qualifications Paul made concerning his indictment of philosophy. (more…)
December 16, 2016
Straight Outta Context #14 – John 8:32 – “the truth will set you free”
Posted by Jason Dulle under Bible, Hermeneutics, Theology[5] Comments
[A]nd you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. (John 8:32)
This phrase adorns the buildings and statues on many college campuses. The message is that knowledge of the truth will liberate one’s mind. While that may be true, is that what Jesus was trying to communicate in John 8:32? Let’s take a look at the context. (more…)
Let the peace of Christ be in control in your heart (for you were in fact called as one body to this peace), and be thankful. (Colossians 3:15)
Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God… (1 John 4:1a)
I can do all things through him who strengthens me. (Philippians 4:13)
See to it that no one fails to obtain the grace of God; that no “root of bitterness” springs up and causes trouble, and by it many become defiled. (Hebrews 12:15)
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. (Colossians 2:8)
[A]nd you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. (John 8:32)