
Critics have claimed the Conquest of Canaan is an example of divinely commanded genocide or ethnic cleansing. In my latest podcast episode (#193), I argue that the rationale for the Conquest had nothing to do with race or ethnicity, and is not an example of genocide. It was not an ethnic cleansing, but a moral cleansing of the land. It was mass capital punishment on those who were guilty of gross immorality. And it’s not even true that everyone was killed. God was more concerned about expelling the Canaanites from the land and destroying their religious influence on the Israelites than He was in killing the Canaanites.
Listen wherever you get podcasts, or at https://www.buzzsprout.com/1958918/episodes/18744936.
I posed a moral dilemma to a few Christian thinkers, but none were able to provide a fully satisfactory answer. While I think most ended up at the right conclusion, no one could really articulate the moral principles used to come to that conclusion. So I thought I would pose the dilemma to AI and see what it had to say. Could it provide any additional insights into Christian moral reasoning? I chose to use ChatGPT and Gemini. I will reproduce the chats below for your reading pleasure, but I would like to make several observations first.
“Hate” is considered a bad word these days. The culture tells us that we should not hate. We have even criminalized hate in the form of “hate crimes.” Many people are under the impression that this attitude toward hate is rooted in Judeo-Christian theology – that the Bible is opposed to all hate. This is not true. While the Bible does condemn certain expressions of hate (e.g. Lev 19:17), it actually teaches us to hate. It’s a matter of who or what we should hate.
If you think “God just wants me to be happy,” you are going to be very disappointed in your Christian life, and inclined toward sin and doubt. False expectations never end well.
Sometimes we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t. Let me give you two examples where Christians cannot seem to win with non-Christians.
Evangelism is scary for many people, including myself. Many Christians find it difficult to start a discussion on spiritual things. Others fear that they’ll be pummeled with objections to the faith that they don’t know how to answer. Many fear rejection. As a result, we’ve invented new methods of “evangelism” that don’t require us to actually talk to anyone. I’m thinking of “friendship evangelism” and “love evangelism” in particular.


